2019
DOI: 10.1037/tra0000369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early relational trauma and self representations: Misattributing externally derived representations as internally generated.

Abstract: Erroneously identifying information derived from other people as self-generated may be a specific sociocognitive propensity linked to early relational trauma and may impact upon the development of self schema. (PsycINFO Database Record

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This also explains the general mechanism of SRE to some extent, because individuals are more sensitive to self-related information. Liao and Chen (2006) found that self-schemata influenced mental health. While patients with depression had underlying negative self-schemata, psychologically healthy people demonstrated rather positive self-schemata, such as positive self-concept and high self-esteem.…”
Section: Self-reference Effect (Sre)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also explains the general mechanism of SRE to some extent, because individuals are more sensitive to self-related information. Liao and Chen (2006) found that self-schemata influenced mental health. While patients with depression had underlying negative self-schemata, psychologically healthy people demonstrated rather positive self-schemata, such as positive self-concept and high self-esteem.…”
Section: Self-reference Effect (Sre)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other recent research has found that relational trauma may be related to a specific social cognitive tendency and may impact on the development of self‐schema (Chiu et al., 2018). In general, offenders differ from the general in the extent of their antisocial behaviour and violence (Gilligan & Lee, 2005; Kelly et al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…study, using a non-clinical sample, participants who reported exposure to sexual abuse had a lower sensitivity (d') in distinguishing between real and imagined stimuli compared to nonexposed individuals (block 1: r = 0.12, p = .07; block 2: r = 0.19, p = .01) [50]. In the fourth study which was in a sample of university students, there was some evidence to suggest that participants exposed to trauma (29%) were more likely to misattribute externally-generated stimuli to self-generated sources in a hierarchical regression analysis after including confounders (B = -0.30, SE = 0.11, T = -2.86, p<0.01) [59].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 96%
“…We included 26 studies [21,] that fulfilled all search criteria (see Table 1 for summary of studies). The studies were based in the following countries: USA (12 studies) [21,35,38,41,43,48,[50][51][52][53][54][55], UK (3 studies) [39,44,46], Australia (2 studies) [40,49], and 1 each in Canada [47], China [59], Greece [36], Holland [45], Italy [56], Japan [58], New Zealand [57], Turkey [37] and Taiwan [42]. Six studies [38,40,48,51,52,56] recruited separate exposed and unexposed samples and the remaining studies were cross-sectional designs.…”
Section: Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%