Early relationships as regulators of infant physiology and behavior

Abstract

Early relationships as regulators of infant physiology and behavior. Acta Pzdiatr 1994; (Suppl 397):9-18. Stockholm. ISSN 0803-5326In recent years, animal research has revealed a network of simple behavioral and biological processes that underlie the psychological constructs we use to define early social relationships. Hidden within the observable interactions of parent and offspring are sensorimotor, thermal and nutrient-based events which have unexpected and widespread regulatory effects on infant behavior and physiology. The complex pattern of responses resulting from early separation in infant rats can be traced to the abrupt withdrawal of a number of discrete, independent regulatory processes which had been acting on individual components of the infant's physiology and behavior. These regulatory processes also appear to mediate long-term shaping effects exerted by early relationships, for example, on the vulnerability of the adult rat to hypertension and stress ulcer. In human development, early regulatory interactions may provide a bridge between biological and psychological processes in the development of our earliest mental representations. 0 Attachment, development, parent-injant intermcrion, psychobiology, separation M A Hojer,

C-tactile afferents: Cutaneous mediators of oxytocin release during affiliative tactile interactions?

“…For example, young rhesus monkeys who receive nurturing physical contact from their mother, following exposure to a stressor, showed a more rapid decline in autonomic and endocrine activity than those who do not receive this contact comfort (Parker et al, 2006). In human infants, parental touch is a key regulator of physiological and behavioural arousal (Hofer, 1994); babies that received skin-to-skin contact with a carer during a medical procedure showed fewer signs of distress and arousal than children wrapped in swaddling (Vannorsdall et al, 2004). Also, in adults, supportive physical contact from a spouse or partner has been shown to modulate physiological responses to an acute stressor significantly more than verbal support (Ditzen et al, 2007).…”

The neuroscience of birth – and the case for Zero Separation

“…The mother's smell (Porter 1998), contact and warmth 'fire' a pathway from the baby's amygdala to its frontal lobe (Bartocci et al 2000), which connects the newborn's emotional and social brain circuits (Nelson & Panksepp 1998). Whilst genes have made this possible (Lagercrantz 1996), the experience of a mother's constant and uninterrupted physical presence make it happen (Hofer 1994). It used to be asked whether 'nature or nurture drove development; more recently it was believed that it was nature and nurture AND niche' -with niche being the environment -that did so.…”

Neonatal maternal separation induces sex-specific augmentation of the hypercapnic ventilatory response in awake rat

“…The formation and fine tuning of neural circuits during early life require adequate sensory guidance, and conditions providing excessive or insufficient levels of stimulation can disrupt system development and compromise their subsequent performance throughout life. The olfactory, tactile, and auditory stimuli that the mother provides her offspring following birth are among the most potent environmental factors contributing to the "neonatal programming" of neural circuits (12,22). Although the life-long consequences of disrupting motherpup interactions have been mainly associated with behavioral and neuroendocrine dysfunction (1, 2, 20), less is known about the impact of mother-pup interaction on other homeostatic functions such as cardiorespiratory regulation.…”