2019
DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early response and safety of lenvatinib for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in a real‐world setting

Abstract: Background and Aim Lenvatinib has been recently approved as a first‐line systematic therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on the results of the phase 3 clinical trial REFLECT. This trial excluded patients with a history of systemic chemotherapy, bile duct invasion, and Child‐Pugh grade B. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib for these patients and in the real‐world setting. Methods Among patients who were administered lenvatinib for advanced HCC betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
45
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the current study found that patients who fulfilled the REFLECT eligibility criteria showed better DCR and OS than those of patients who did not fulfill the REFLECT eligibility criteria (DCR: 85.4 vs. 68.3%, p value 0.045, median OS duration: 13.9 months [8.1–19.7] vs. 8.7 months [7.6–9.8]), which confronts the result from the recent Japanese study of 41 patients with unresectable HCC [19]. This is due to the difference in detail components of patients who did not fulfill the REFLECT eligibility criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…However, the current study found that patients who fulfilled the REFLECT eligibility criteria showed better DCR and OS than those of patients who did not fulfill the REFLECT eligibility criteria (DCR: 85.4 vs. 68.3%, p value 0.045, median OS duration: 13.9 months [8.1–19.7] vs. 8.7 months [7.6–9.8]), which confronts the result from the recent Japanese study of 41 patients with unresectable HCC [19]. This is due to the difference in detail components of patients who did not fulfill the REFLECT eligibility criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The results of the REFLECT trial and clinical data have widened the therapeutic options for patients with unresectable HCC. 7,15 Currently, patients with unresectable HCC may be treated with either sorafenib or lenvatinib in the first line. However, to date, criteria for their selection based on patients' characteristics have not been established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with our results, it has been reported that portal hypertension-induced slow blood flow increases ANG2 expression [ 27 , 28 ]. We and other groups have shown that, in patients with advanced HCC, high serum ANG2 levels were sometimes observed [ 29 , 16 ]. Additionally, several recent studies have revealed that high ANG2 expression could predict pathological angiogenesis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, occurrence and recurrence of HCC after direct-acting antiviral therapy, mortality, and deterioration of kidney function in decompensated cirrhosis [ 28 , 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lenvatinib, which targets VEGFR1-3, fibroblast growth factor receptors 1-4, plateletderived growth factor receptor-α, c-Kit, and rearranged during transfection proto-oncogene [11,12], demonstrated non-inferiority to sorafenib in terms of OS in unresectable HCC [8]. The efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable HCC have been demonstrated in a real-world setting [13][14][15][16][17]. However, some patients experienced deterioration of the liver functional reserve during lenvatinib treatment for HCC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%