2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early risk stratification of patients with major trauma requiring massive blood transfusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
96
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
96
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[18] Consistent with previous studies, blood transfusion and surgery were associated with improved survival. [6,18,19] ROSC was lower (14.9%) compared to reported rate of 26%, in previous study. [13] The overall survival in this study (2.4%) was higher than 1.7%, reported in a recent Australian study.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…[18] Consistent with previous studies, blood transfusion and surgery were associated with improved survival. [6,18,19] ROSC was lower (14.9%) compared to reported rate of 26%, in previous study. [13] The overall survival in this study (2.4%) was higher than 1.7%, reported in a recent Australian study.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…However, some studies showed no relationship between transfusion and postoperative complications [20,21]. However, transfusions are an essential treatment method in cases of massive bleeding [22]. These controversial findings imply that the Hb level can be used as an indicator for transfusion [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, we have in place a '1:1' policy for serious trauma patients requiring massive blood transfusion at the Prince of Wales Hospital, having analysed all '1:1' Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier survival curves of trauma patients [12] requiring massive transfusion, for high (thick) and low (thin) fresh frozen plasma: packed red blood cell ratio; a) ratio not treated as a time-dependent covariate (p < 0.001); b) ratio treated as a time-dependent covariate (p = 0.17). studies and reasoned that massive loss of blood needs replacement with its equivalent (roughly equal number of units of PRBC, FFP and platelets) [2,13,14]. One must always apply common sense.…”
Section: (Common) Sense and Sensibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%