1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf02348208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early sex change: A possible mating strategy ofCentropyge angelfishes (Pisces: Pomacanthidae)

Abstract: Abstract-Although the presence of socially controlled sex change in pomacanthid fishes of the genus Centropyge has been known since 1978, it has always been assumed that such sex change occurred only after the death or disappearance of the dominant male in single male social groups. Between 1978 and 1983, we observed several incidences of sex change by ranking female angelfishes within their harems and in the presence of the dominant male in each such harem. This phenomenon was observed in Cetropyge interruptu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Loss of a well-defined size hierarchy then appears to destabilize the group overall, as groups with closely sized ranks were more likely to undergo fission during our study period. Harem fission has been previously observed in C. bicolor (Aldenhoven 1984) and several other haremic fishes (Robertson 1974;Moyer & Zaiser 1984;Lutnesky 1994;Sakai 1997). We note that although spatial segregation may cause instability for the group, the individuals concerned might benefit from fission: lowranking females move up in rank and size, while high-ranking females may ascend to the dominant male position significantly sooner (albeit with a smaller number of subordinate females to mate with), in addition to saving the energetic costs associated with aggressive coercion of oft-encountered relatively large subordinates.…”
Section: Discussion (A) Aggression As a Stabilizing Signal Of Conflicmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Loss of a well-defined size hierarchy then appears to destabilize the group overall, as groups with closely sized ranks were more likely to undergo fission during our study period. Harem fission has been previously observed in C. bicolor (Aldenhoven 1984) and several other haremic fishes (Robertson 1974;Moyer & Zaiser 1984;Lutnesky 1994;Sakai 1997). We note that although spatial segregation may cause instability for the group, the individuals concerned might benefit from fission: lowranking females move up in rank and size, while high-ranking females may ascend to the dominant male position significantly sooner (albeit with a smaller number of subordinate females to mate with), in addition to saving the energetic costs associated with aggressive coercion of oft-encountered relatively large subordinates.…”
Section: Discussion (A) Aggression As a Stabilizing Signal Of Conflicmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Early and late sex change Females sometimes change sex at a size where they appear to have little chance of breeding as a male (early sex change) and thus experience no immediate gain in reproductive success [38,39]. Early sex change might be a viable alternative strategy if non-reproductives have decreased mortality rates or increased growth rates [7], so that a small decrease in current reproductive success results in a much larger gain in RV.…”
Section: No Sex Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since single dominant males of such species can mate with almost all females within their territories (e.g. Neudecker & Lobe1 1982, Kuwamura 1984, Moyer 1984, Nakazono et al 1985, Donaldson 1990), defence of the territories enable males to maximize mating success (Moyer & Zaiser 1984, Thresher 1984, Moyer 1987. Males thus should spend more time protecting territories and maintaining social dominance over females, and less time foraging than do females (Hixon 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%