2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.01.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early tracheostomy in patients with cervical spine injury reduces morbidity and improves resource utilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mostly of the presented mortality rates between LT and ET analysis do not demonstrate statistically significance [113,114,117,119,120,[124][125][126][127][128], which could be a response of ET placement in critical state patients [86]. Hence, no definitive conclusion could be drawn by the absence of mortality significance, as well, patients functional state at discharge could not be assured.…”
Section: The Benefits Of Tracheostomy On Tbimentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mostly of the presented mortality rates between LT and ET analysis do not demonstrate statistically significance [113,114,117,119,120,[124][125][126][127][128], which could be a response of ET placement in critical state patients [86]. Hence, no definitive conclusion could be drawn by the absence of mortality significance, as well, patients functional state at discharge could not be assured.…”
Section: The Benefits Of Tracheostomy On Tbimentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Likewise, decreased risk of ventilator associated pneumonia was found. Complementary literature comparing early and late tracheostomy (LT) populations demonstrated lower ICU stay [113,[117][118][119][120], lower hospital stay [117,120], lower rates for pneumonia [113,117,119,120] and lower costs [113,117].…”
Section: The Benefits Of Tracheostomy On Tbimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of included studies are summarized in Table 1. Studies differed in their de nitions of early and late tracheostomy (Supplemental Appendix 6), although the majority utilized a range of <7 days (from either injury, intubation, or surgery) for early tracheostomy [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. In one study, early and late tracheostomy were de ned as <7 days and >7 days, respectively, but the time point from which tracheostomy was measured was not speci ed [34].…”
Section: Study Characteristics and Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of modern respiratory management strategies, promoting early tracheostomy as an important component of future CSCI management and reconsidering the indications for endotracheal intubation are both important and complement each other. A recent retrospective study reported that early tracheostomy (≤7 days) in CSCI was associated with lower incidence of VAP and shorter duration of ventilatory management, ICU stay, and hospitalization [ 14 ]. On the other hand, tracheostomy itself (both early and late) in CSCI is an independent predictor of ventilator dependence, and there are potential disadvantages inherent in empiric tracheostomy without attempting extubation [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern invasive airway management in CSCI has accelerated the trend toward early tracheostomy with a minimum of 4 days once intubated [ 15 ], but several previous studies have shown that one of the independent predictors of the need for tracheostomy is intubation in the ED [ 16 , 17 ]. Many previous studies investigating the usefulness of tracheostomy for CSCI have not described the indications for tracheal intubation [ 12 , 14 18 ], reminding us that early routine tracheal intubation for motor-complete injury above C5 is taken for granted. However, the potential risk that absolute indications for intubation based on neurological assessment may increase unnecessary empirical tracheostomies and the limitations of clinical studies that may not rigorously assess the role of tracheostomy have not been fully elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%