2020
DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early tumor shrinkage identifies long-term disease control and survival in patients with lung cancer treated with atezolizumab

Abstract: BackgroundPreliminary evidence indicates that early tumor shrinkage (ETS) following immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) initiation may be associated with survival outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma. ETS has not been explored as a biomarker of survival outcomes or patient-reported outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with ICIs.MethodsThe study pooled data from patients with NSCLC in the randomized trials OAK and POPLAR (atezolizumab vs docetaxel; n=1464), and sing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our observation about the association of ETS with survival outcomes is in line with previously reported data in patients with other tumor types treated with ICIs. [15][16][17] Of note, some of these previous studies are limited by the inclusion of patients with primary progressive diseasewho have an extremely poor survival-in the subgroup without ETS, thus magnifying the prognostic impact of ETS itself. Here, we decided to properly restrict our focus on patients with disease control at the first radiological reassessment, as in the work of Kawachi et al 16 From a clinical perspective, we observed that patients treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy and not achieving ETS at the 8/9 weeks time point had a clearly and significantly worse outcome as compared with other patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our observation about the association of ETS with survival outcomes is in line with previously reported data in patients with other tumor types treated with ICIs. [15][16][17] Of note, some of these previous studies are limited by the inclusion of patients with primary progressive diseasewho have an extremely poor survival-in the subgroup without ETS, thus magnifying the prognostic impact of ETS itself. Here, we decided to properly restrict our focus on patients with disease control at the first radiological reassessment, as in the work of Kawachi et al 16 From a clinical perspective, we observed that patients treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy and not achieving ETS at the 8/9 weeks time point had a clearly and significantly worse outcome as compared with other patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be specific, regarding accessibility, baseline tumor burden and metastatic sites are readily available at diagnosis through image examinations without additional and subsequent tests, whereas early tumor shrinkage should be assessed at the six-week visit. 11 As for stability, the primary and metastatic lesion spectrum would not be disturbed by the short-term physical condition, whilst hematological markers (e.g. LIPI 7 , 8 and CRP 10 ) might be affected by infection, trauma, and the usage of glucocorticoids or antibiotics, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 3 , 4 Thus, numerous parameters predicting ideal candidates for second-line ICI treatment have been identified as potential markers, 5 encompassing body mass index (BMI), 6 neutrophil and lymphocyte count number (LIPI), 7 , 8 C-reactive protein (CRP), 9 patient-reported physical function. 10 Still, efforts to establish effective markers from other dimensions, specially from image examinations, 11 are warranted to complement the field and promote precision medicine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TGI metrics used in the models were previously derived based on tumor size data 13 and have been shown to capture treatment effect and could be considered as a predictive biomarker for OS. [11][12][13]35 The four ML methods evaluated in the analysis included covariate/feature selection and prediction, where feature selection builds a screening model by removing the redundant features. In traditional modeling approaches, the rule of parsimony dictates a goal of finding the fewest number of variables that can accurately predict outcome for model stability, even though important information may be lost if variables that are not sufficiently predictive are excluded from the model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dataset would not be considered high‐dimensional for ML analysis, but the application of ML approaches to the data could nevertheless provide comparative insights. The TGI metrics used in the models were previously derived based on tumor size data 13 and have been shown to capture treatment effect and could be considered as a predictive biomarker for OS 11–13,35 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%