Early versus delayed complex abdominal wall reconstruction with biologic mesh following damage-control surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND Damage-control surgery for trauma and intra-abdominal catastrophe is associated with a high rate of morbidities and postoperative complications. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing early complex abdominal wall reconstruction (e-CAWR) in acute settings versus those undergoing delayed complex abdominal wall reconstruction (d-CAWR). METHOD This study was a pooled analysis derived from the retrospective and prospective database between the years 2013 and 2019. The outcomes were compared for differences in demographics, presentation, intraoperative variables, Ventral Hernia Working Grade (VHWG), US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention wound class, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, and readmission rates. We performed Student’s t test, χ2 test, and Fisher’s exact test to compare variables of interest. Multivariable linear regression model was built to evaluate the association of hospital length of stay and all other variables including the timing of complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR). A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS Of the 236 patients who underwent CAWR with biological mesh, 79 (33.5%) had e-CAWR. There were 45 males (57%) and 34 females (43%) in the e-CAWR group. The ASA scores of IV and V, and VHWG grades III and IV were significantly more frequent in the e-CAWR group compared with the d-CAWR one. Postoperatively, the incidence of surgical site occurrence, Clavien-Dindo complications, comprehensive complication index, unplanned reoperations, and mortality were similar between the two groups. Backward linear regression model showed that the timing of CAWR (β = −11.29, p < 0.0001), ASA (β = 3.98, p = 0.006), VHWG classification (β = 3.62, p = 0.015), drug abuse (β = 13.47, p = 0.009), and two comorbidities of cirrhosis (β = 12.34, p = 0.001) and malignancy (β = 7.91, p = 0.008) were the significant predictors of the hospital length of stay left in the model. CONCLUSION Early CAWR led to shorter hospital length of stay compared with d-CAWR in multivariable regression model. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, level IV.

Risk Factors for Mortality in Emergently Admitted Patients with Acute Gastric Ulcer: An Analysis of 15,538 Patients in National Inpatient Sample, 2005–2014

“…This research points to the fact that a short time to surgery is critical for patient survivability, and the present study shows that indeed patients with gastric ulcer perforations all had the shortest time to surgery values for both age groups. A recent retrospective cohort study evaluated patients with complex abdominal wall reconstruction surgery and found that a shorter time to surgery led to a shorter HLOS, which can be predictive of decreased mortality as discussed below [ 34 ]. Additionally, our results showed that the surviving adult group had significantly shorter time to surgery values compared to the deceased group.…”

The open abdomen in trauma, acute care, and vascular and endovascular surgery: comprehensive, expert, narrative review

“…Unfortunately, this is associated with several wound-related complications and fails to address hernias that are non-midline, subxiphoid, suprapubic, and parastomal as well as those associated with loss of domain 110 . For these reasons, some surgeons have transitioned to using posterior components separation with transverse abdominal release and mesh reinforcement, particularly for the hernias mentioned above 124–126 . In situations where abdominal wall reconstruction is not possible with a mesh and/or component separation, more advanced reconstructive techniques, such as a tensor fascia lata flap can be used 127 , 128 .…”

Subtotal Thigh Flap for Large Abdominal Wall Defect Reconstruction in Patient With Recurrent Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans

“…Severe injury and oncologic abdomen resection may cause significant abdominal defects 1 . Although primary closure or short-interval defect repair is highly recommended, 2 a complex and massive abdominal wall reconstruction could be challenging in these situations. Stable and adequate coverage is required.…”