2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11552-012-9408-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early versus Delayed Imaginal Exposure for the Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Following Accidental Upper Extremity Injury

Abstract: Background The consequences following work-related injuries are far reaching, which are in part due to unrecognized and untreated posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Imaginal exposure is a frequently used cognitive behavioral approach for the treatment of PTSD. This study examined the impact of early versus delayed treatment with imaginal exposure on amelioration of PTSD symptomatology in individuals who suffered upper extremity injuries. Methods Sixty individuals who suffered severe workrelated injuries rec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of them described short-term outcomes for the active treatment versus the waitlist condition (Högberg et al, 2007) and one reported long-term outcomes for the active treatment after the waitlist had also been provided with the intervention (Högberg et al, 2008); the latter study was selected to represent this data set in the RD analysis. Six reports stemmed from the same clinic (Grunert et al, 1989; Grunert, Devine, Smith, et al, 1992; Grunert, Matloub, Sanger, & Yousif, 1990; Grunert et al, 2007; Salyards, 2005; Weis, Grunert, & Christianson, 2012) delivering interventions to treat posttraumatic stress in individuals with industrial injuries. Their study participants were not identical but overlapped to some extent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…One of them described short-term outcomes for the active treatment versus the waitlist condition (Högberg et al, 2007) and one reported long-term outcomes for the active treatment after the waitlist had also been provided with the intervention (Högberg et al, 2008); the latter study was selected to represent this data set in the RD analysis. Six reports stemmed from the same clinic (Grunert et al, 1989; Grunert, Devine, Smith, et al, 1992; Grunert, Matloub, Sanger, & Yousif, 1990; Grunert et al, 2007; Salyards, 2005; Weis, Grunert, & Christianson, 2012) delivering interventions to treat posttraumatic stress in individuals with industrial injuries. Their study participants were not identical but overlapped to some extent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their study participants were not identical but overlapped to some extent. While all of these studies are described in the narrative part of this review, Weis et al (2012) was selected for the first RD analysis. Grunert and his colleagues were also the only study group examining interventions for workers who had previously failed to RTW with standard PTSD treatment; three of their articles (Grunert et al, 1989; Grunert, Devine, Smith, et al, 1992; Grunert et al, 2007; whose samples did not overlap) provided the data for the second RD analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The study by Gersons et al (2000) included a 3-month follow-up period, while Weis (1999) and Grunert et al (1989, 1992) conducted follow-up at 6 or 12 months [25,21,8,20]. The effects of follow-up measurements on generalizability are discussed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%