2018
DOI: 10.5935/0103-507x.20180054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early versus delayed initiation of renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury: an updated systematic review, meta-analysis, meta-regression and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract: ObjectiveTo evaluate whether early initiation of renal replacement therapy is associated with lower mortality in patients with acute kidney injury compared to delayed initiation.MethodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing early versus delayed initiation of renal replacement therapy in patients with acute kidney injury without the life-threatening acute kidney injury-related symptoms of fluid overload or metabolic disorders. Two investigators extracted the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, Moreira et al found an increased risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection when renal replacement therapy was initiated early. Moreira FT, et al [10] our study doesn’t confirm this finding.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…On the contrary, Moreira et al found an increased risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection when renal replacement therapy was initiated early. Moreira FT, et al [10] our study doesn’t confirm this finding.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…However, a considerable proportion of the included studies in these three reviews were non-RCTs, meaning that the data were prone to confounding factors. Another two meta-analyses with TSA of RCTs conducted by Moreira et al and Feng et al failed to establish sufficient and conclusive evidences, because the cumulative Z curve did not cross the conventional boundary, the trial sequential monitoring boundary and the futility boundary, and the required information size was not reached [ 33 , 34 ]. However, in our meta-analysis, the cumulative Z curve crossed the futility boundaries, suggesting the results that early initiation of RRT was not associated with a lower mortality were reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appropriate time to initiate RRT in a critical care setting has not been defined [20]. Studies on the issues of early versus delayed initiation of RRT show heterogeneous results in a critical care setting [2123]. In the case of OHCA treated with TTM, studies on early initiation of RRT have not yet been conducted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%