Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
BackgroundEarly femoral neck shortening after femoral neck system (FNS) fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures can occur in 22.3%–39.1% of cases, leading to decreased hip joint function. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of using an anti‐shortening screw (ASS) in FNS fixation to prevent postoperative femoral neck shortening in displaced femoral neck fractures.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 106 cases of displaced femoral neck fractures treated with FNS at the Hospital from April 2020 to April 2023. Patients were divided into two groups based on the use of an ASS: the traditional group and the ASS group, each consisting of 53 cases. The ASS group was age‐matched with the traditional group treated during the same period without an ASS. The study variables included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking and drinking history, injury mechanism, side of injury, fracture type, surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, Harris Hip Score (HHS) at the final follow‐up, radiographic assessment (femoral neck shortening), and complications (infection, femoral head necrosis, nonunion, and secondary surgery). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, with continuous and categorical variables analyzed using appropriate parametric (t‐test) and nonparametric (Mann–Whitney U test) tests, and chi‐square or Fisher's exact tests, respectively. A p‐value <0.05 was considered significant.ResultsThere were no significant differences in background characteristics between the traditional and ASS groups. The shortening distance at postoperative day 1 did not differ significantly between the two groups (0 vs. 0 mm, p = 0.120). However, at 1, 3 months, and 1 year postoperatively, the femoral neck shortening in the ASS group was significantly less than that in the traditional group (1 month: 2.3 vs. 3.1 mm, p = 0.007; 3 months: 2.6 vs. 3.5 mm, p = 0.005; 1 year: 2.6 vs. 3.5 mm, p = 0.002). The ASS group also had a significantly lower shortening distance during the fracture healing process (0.9 vs. 2.7 mm, p = 0.005). The incidence of moderate to severe shortening (≥5 mm) at 1 year postoperatively was lower in the ASS group compared with the traditional group (15.1% vs. 37.7%, p = 0.001). The ASS group had a longer surgical time (63.0 ± 13.4 vs. 73.0 ± 23.2 min, p = 0.008) and a higher HHS (90.7 vs. 94.8, p = 0.008). There was no significant difference in fracture healing time or postoperative complications between the two groups. The traditional group had 3.8% cutouts, 7.5% nonunions, 5.7% avascular necrosis, and 7.5% secondary hip replacements. The ASS group saw 0% cutouts, 1.9% nonunions, 3.8% avascular necrosis, and 3.8% hip replacements. No significant differences in complication rates (p > 0.05).ConclusionThe use of an ASS in FNS fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures can reduce the degree of postoperative shortening and improve hip joint function.
BackgroundEarly femoral neck shortening after femoral neck system (FNS) fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures can occur in 22.3%–39.1% of cases, leading to decreased hip joint function. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of using an anti‐shortening screw (ASS) in FNS fixation to prevent postoperative femoral neck shortening in displaced femoral neck fractures.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 106 cases of displaced femoral neck fractures treated with FNS at the Hospital from April 2020 to April 2023. Patients were divided into two groups based on the use of an ASS: the traditional group and the ASS group, each consisting of 53 cases. The ASS group was age‐matched with the traditional group treated during the same period without an ASS. The study variables included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking and drinking history, injury mechanism, side of injury, fracture type, surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, Harris Hip Score (HHS) at the final follow‐up, radiographic assessment (femoral neck shortening), and complications (infection, femoral head necrosis, nonunion, and secondary surgery). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, with continuous and categorical variables analyzed using appropriate parametric (t‐test) and nonparametric (Mann–Whitney U test) tests, and chi‐square or Fisher's exact tests, respectively. A p‐value <0.05 was considered significant.ResultsThere were no significant differences in background characteristics between the traditional and ASS groups. The shortening distance at postoperative day 1 did not differ significantly between the two groups (0 vs. 0 mm, p = 0.120). However, at 1, 3 months, and 1 year postoperatively, the femoral neck shortening in the ASS group was significantly less than that in the traditional group (1 month: 2.3 vs. 3.1 mm, p = 0.007; 3 months: 2.6 vs. 3.5 mm, p = 0.005; 1 year: 2.6 vs. 3.5 mm, p = 0.002). The ASS group also had a significantly lower shortening distance during the fracture healing process (0.9 vs. 2.7 mm, p = 0.005). The incidence of moderate to severe shortening (≥5 mm) at 1 year postoperatively was lower in the ASS group compared with the traditional group (15.1% vs. 37.7%, p = 0.001). The ASS group had a longer surgical time (63.0 ± 13.4 vs. 73.0 ± 23.2 min, p = 0.008) and a higher HHS (90.7 vs. 94.8, p = 0.008). There was no significant difference in fracture healing time or postoperative complications between the two groups. The traditional group had 3.8% cutouts, 7.5% nonunions, 5.7% avascular necrosis, and 7.5% secondary hip replacements. The ASS group saw 0% cutouts, 1.9% nonunions, 3.8% avascular necrosis, and 3.8% hip replacements. No significant differences in complication rates (p > 0.05).ConclusionThe use of an ASS in FNS fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures can reduce the degree of postoperative shortening and improve hip joint function.
Objective Femoral neck fractures (FNFs) are among the most common fractures in elderly individuals. Surgery is the main treatment for FNFs, and osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is one of the unacceptable complications. This study aimed to assess both the clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with FNFs treated with three parallel cannulated screws and to identify relationship between screws position and ONFH. Patients and methods A total of 100 patients who were treated with closed reduction and fixed with 3 parallel cannulated screws met the inclusion criteria between January 2014 and December 2020 at authors’ institution. The follow-up duration, age, sex, affected side, and injury-to-surgery interval were collected; the neck-shaft angle of both hips, screw-apex distance (SAD) and the tip-apex distance (TAD)were measured; and the Garden classification, quality of reduction and presence of ONFH were evaluated. Results The sample consisted of 37 males and 63 females, with 60 left and 40 right hips affected. The mean age of patients was 54.93 ± 12.24 years, and the mean follow-up was 56.3 ± 13.38 months. The overall incidence of ONFH was 13%. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of ONFH by affected side, age, fracture displacement, injury-to-surgery interval, neck-shaft angle deviation, or reduction quality. The SAD was significantly shorter in ONFH patients than in normal patients for all three screws (p = 0.02, 0.02, and 0.01, respectively). Conclusions The short SAD of all screws is associated with femoral head necrosis of FNFs treated with 3 cannulated screws. The short SAD indicated that screws malpositioning in the weight-bearing area of the femoral head, potentially harming the blood supply and compromising the anchorage of the primary compressive trabeculae in this region.
Background Displaced femoral neck fractures frequently result in considerable patient morbidity, with complications such as postoperative femoral neck shortening occurring in up to 39.1% of cases. This shortening is associated with reduced hip function and mobility. The Femoral Neck System (FNS), which allows for controlled sliding to facilitate fracture reduction and healing, may mitigate these issues. However, the ideal sliding distance to balance fracture healing and minimize complications is not well defined. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of 179 patients who underwent FNS fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures at our institution from September 2019 to September 2023. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the intraoperative sliding distance allowed by the FNS: the Minimal Slide group (≤ 5 mm), the Moderate Slide group (> 5 to ≤ 10 mm), and the Extensive Slide group (> 10 to 20 mm). Primary outcomes included postoperative femoral neck shortening, the incidence of moderate to severe shortening, time to fracture union, and hip joint function as assessed by the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Parker Mobility Score. Secondary outcomes included complication rates such as implant cut-out, nonunion, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and the need for secondary surgery. Results The Extensive Slide group of moderate to severe shortening at 32.31%, which was 1.59-fold and 8.88-fold that of the Moderate Slide (20.34%) and Minimal Slide group’s (3.64%), respectively ( P < 0.01). The sliding predominantly occurred within the first three months postoperatively and had substantially ceased by six months. At one year postoperatively, the median shortening was 2.7 mm (IQR, 0.7 to 3.5 mm) for the Minimal Slide group, a value that was notably lower compared to the 3.2 mm (IQR, 2.4 to 4.6 mm) for the Moderate Slide group and the 3.5 mm (IQR, 1.3 to 8.1 mm) for the Extensive Slide group. The average time to achieve union was similar across all groups, with no significant differences. Functional outcomes, as assessed by the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Parker Mobility Score, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) demonstrated statistical significance, the Parker Mobility Score did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions Restricting FNS slide to ≤ 5 mm in surgery may reduce shortening, improve hip function, and not hinder fracture healing or implant stability. Considering the key 3-month sliding timeline postoperatively is advisable in clinical practice. Further research with a broader patient cohort is vital to confirm these findings and to anchor them in evidence-based practice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.