Early VERsus Later Augmented Physiotherapy compared with usual physiotherapy (EVERLAP): a feasibility randomised controlled trial of arm function after stroke

Experiences of augmented arm rehabilitation including supported self-management after stroke: a qualitative investigation

“…Information about the EVERLAP study is reported in detail elsewhere. 15 Briefly, stroke survivors were randomized into one of three groups; the Early group (starting augmented arm rehabilitation three weeks post stroke, together with usual care), the Later group (starting nine weeks post stroke, together with usual care) or the usual care only group. The content of the intervention comprised a manual of routinely available physiotherapy interventions, aimed at improving meaningful functional activity of the affected arm, based on current best evidence.…”

“…The primary outcome was the Action Research Arm Test at 24 weeks and a tool kit of secondary outcomes included measures of impairment, activity limitation and participation restriction. 15 The aim of this qualitative study was not to compare the Early and Later groups, but to explore the experiences of participants in both these groups.…”

“…The inclusion criteria for this qualitative study followed the eligibility criteria for stroke survivors and their carers (if available) in the EVERLAP study. 15 In addition, all stroke survivors (including anyone with aphasia), who had completed the augmented arm rehabilitation (from either the Early or Later group) and were willing to take part in an interview were invited to this qualitative study. A convenience sampling approach was used.…”