2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-009-0177-0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early warning of rainfall-induced shallow landslides and debris flows in the USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
266
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 468 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
266
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In the USA, the US Geological Survey has long been working on ReLEWSs in a number of states: California, Colorado, Oregon and Washington (Chleborad, 2000;Chleborad et al, 2008;Baum and Godt, 2010;NOAA-USGS, 2005;Cannon et al, 2011). The state of knowledge and resources available to issue alerts of precipitation-induced shallow, rapidly moving landslides and debris flows vary across the USA; for instance, in the city of Seattle, WA, the alert system includes four levels -Null, Outlook, Watch and Alarm -and warnings are based on the measured or expected exceedance of cumulated rainfall and intensity-duration thresholds combined with criteria using monitored soil moisture (Godt et al, 2006).…”
Section: Regional Systems For Rainfall-induced Landslidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the USA, the US Geological Survey has long been working on ReLEWSs in a number of states: California, Colorado, Oregon and Washington (Chleborad, 2000;Chleborad et al, 2008;Baum and Godt, 2010;NOAA-USGS, 2005;Cannon et al, 2011). The state of knowledge and resources available to issue alerts of precipitation-induced shallow, rapidly moving landslides and debris flows vary across the USA; for instance, in the city of Seattle, WA, the alert system includes four levels -Null, Outlook, Watch and Alarm -and warnings are based on the measured or expected exceedance of cumulated rainfall and intensity-duration thresholds combined with criteria using monitored soil moisture (Godt et al, 2006).…”
Section: Regional Systems For Rainfall-induced Landslidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, literature studies rarely back analyze the relationship between warnings, which would have been issued adopting those correlations, and landslides. Especially for LEWSs operating at regional scale (ReLEWSs), empirical evaluations are often carried out by simply analyzing the time frames during which significant high-consequence landslides occurred in the test area (Keefer et al, 1987;Baum and Godt, 2010;Capparelli and Tiranti, 2010;Aleotti, 2004). Alternatively, the performance evaluation is based on 2 by 2 contingency tables computed for the joint frequency distribution of landslides and alerts, both considered as dichotomous variables (Yu et al, 2003;Cheung et al, 2006;Godt et al, 2006;Restrepo et al, 2008;Tiranti and Rabuffetti, 2010;Kirschbaum et al, 2012;Martelloni et al, 2012;Peres and Cancelliere, 2012;Staley et al, 2013;Lagomarsino et al, 2013Lagomarsino et al, , 2015Greco et al, 2013;Segoni et al, 2014;Gariano et al, 2015;Stähli et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is quite common in areas with scarce vegetation or that have been recently affected by forest fires, thus becoming more susceptible to erosion (e.g., Cannon et al, 2001a;Cannon and Gartner, 2005;Cannon et al, 2008;Santi et al, 2008;Baum and Godt, 2010;Cannon et al, 2011;Kean et al, 2013;Staley et al, 2013b;Staley et al, 2014). 25 The consumption of vegetation, ash deposition, changes in physical properties of soils and rocks and the presence of waterrepellent soils are typical consequences of fire (Cannon and Gartner, 2005;Cannon et al, 2010;Parise and Cannon, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various similar landslide prediction systems have been developed worldwide (allasia et al, 2013;Baum et al, 2010;osanai et al, 2010;merCogliano et al, 2010;TiranTe et al, 2014;THieBes, 2012). In general, they vary by their observed parameters, technology used, and technological readiness level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%