1991
DOI: 10.2307/2491026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earnings Asan Explanatory Variable for Returns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

42
665
7
14

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 905 publications
(728 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
42
665
7
14
Order By: Relevance
“…This table presents the results of the regression model that examines the effect of antitakeover laws on the informativeness of accruals and cash flow based on the approach of Easton and Harris (1991). The dependent variable is cumulative return starting three months after fiscal year end t-1 to six months after fiscal year end t. EARN is the firm's earnings in year t scaled by its assets at the end of year t-1.…”
Section: Table 2 Summary Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This table presents the results of the regression model that examines the effect of antitakeover laws on the informativeness of accruals and cash flow based on the approach of Easton and Harris (1991). The dependent variable is cumulative return starting three months after fiscal year end t-1 to six months after fiscal year end t. EARN is the firm's earnings in year t scaled by its assets at the end of year t-1.…”
Section: Table 2 Summary Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not more tautological than explaining stock return by accounting return; see e.g. Easton and Harris (1991). The fact that we do not obtain results with unreasonably high R 2 -values, also indicates sound models in this respect; see Table 4.…”
Section: Hypotheses and Test Methodologymentioning
confidence: 49%
“…7 An examination of the value-relevance of competitive advantage, specified by regression (3), is closely related to the literature testing the value-relevance of various performance metrics, such as firm return or abnormal firm return. Easton and Harris (1991), and most of the literature on the value-relevance of accounting information, demonstrate that accounting earnings and changes in such earnings, deflated by the stock price, are highly relevant for explaining abnormal stock market return. In large samples, the accounting return on market-based equity typically explains about 8-10% of abnormal stock market return, measured on an annual basis.…”
Section: Hypotheses and Test Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miller and Modigliani, 1961) and empirical (e.g. Easton and Harris, 1991). Another theoretical perspective on the market-accounting value relationship is provide by Penman (1992), who also argued for a "return to fundamentals."…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%