2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2011.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earnings management induced by tax planning: The case of Portuguese private firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
48
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
48
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In countries like Italy, characterized by a close alignment between accounting and tax rules, tax incentives greatly impact on private companies' earnings management practices (e.g. Coppens & Peek, 2005;Goncharov & Zimmermann, 2006;Marques et al, 2011;Poli, 2013b). With regard to the findings referring to financial incentives, Poli (2013b) has posited that it could depend on the fact that Italian banks do not attribute great importance to the financial information provided by Italian private companies' financial statements.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In countries like Italy, characterized by a close alignment between accounting and tax rules, tax incentives greatly impact on private companies' earnings management practices (e.g. Coppens & Peek, 2005;Goncharov & Zimmermann, 2006;Marques et al, 2011;Poli, 2013b). With regard to the findings referring to financial incentives, Poli (2013b) has posited that it could depend on the fact that Italian banks do not attribute great importance to the financial information provided by Italian private companies' financial statements.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beaver, McNichols, & Nelson, 2007;Dechow, Richardson, & Tuna, 2003;Durtschi & Easton, 2005, 2009Holland, 2004;Lahr, 2014;McNichols, 2003), it has been widely used to detect the presence of earnings management practices (e.g. Baber & Kang, 2002;Beatty, Ke, & Petroni, 2002;Brown & Caylor, 2004;Burgstahler & Dichev, 1997;Collins, Pincus, & Xie, 1999;Coppens & Peek, 2005;Daske, Gebhardt, & McLeay, 2006;Degeorge, Patel, & Zeckhauser, 1999;Easton, 1999;Gore, Pope, & Singh, 2007;Hamdi & Zarai, 2012;Hayn, 1995;Holland & Ramsay, 2003;Jacob & Jorgensen, 2007;Kerstein & Rai, 2007;Marques et al, 2011;Moreira, 2006;Phillips, Pincus, Rego, & Wan, 2004;Poli, 2013aPoli, , 2013bRevsine, Collins, Johnson, & Mittelstaedt, 2009). According to this approach, we assume that a company practices EM if the reported earnings of a fiscal year, scaled to total assets of the previous fiscal year, assumes a value between 0 and 0.005 (0 is included, 0.005 is excluded) and that a company practices ECM if the reported earnings change of a fiscal year (determined as the difference between the reported earnings of a fiscal year and the reported earnings of the previous fiscal year), scaled to total assets of the second previous fiscal year, assumes a value between -0.0025 and 0.0025 (-0.0025 is included, 0.0025 is excluded).…”
Section: Dependent Variables-measures Of Earnings Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations