2017
DOI: 10.22547/ber/9.2.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earnings Quality: A Missing Link between Corporate Governance and Firm Value

Abstract: The existing literature concerning governance-value

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
85
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(69 reference statements)
10
85
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Greater risk helps firms to generate earnings. Firm size positively affects firm performance and is in line with the previous findings related to Pakistan [Latif, Bhatti, and Raheman (2017)]. The size factor is relevant with the view that larger firms do better than others in terms of survival while larger board size may ensure less exploitation of the resources due to monitoring of the independent members.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…1 Greater risk helps firms to generate earnings. Firm size positively affects firm performance and is in line with the previous findings related to Pakistan [Latif, Bhatti, and Raheman (2017)]. The size factor is relevant with the view that larger firms do better than others in terms of survival while larger board size may ensure less exploitation of the resources due to monitoring of the independent members.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…In aggrement with previous studies as i mentioned before, trend of research reccomended earnings quality as the most significant factors that effect to the financial effectiveness of companies (Gaio & Raposo, 2011). That research stated that a quality of earnings is supposed to allow companies to win public gain goodwill and confidence, so be able to achieve competitive advantage and superior subsequent performance (Latif et al, 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Adapting from Francis et al (2004); Gaio and Raposo (2014) and Latif et al (2017) this research evaluates earnings quality (EAQ) on seven attributes: (1) Accrual quality, (2) Persistence, (3) Predictability and (4) Smoothness as well as (5) Value relevance, (6) Timeliness and (7) Conservatism. Accrual quality is assessed on the view that earnings that map more closely into cash are more favorable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conservatism is evaluated as the ratio of the slope coefficients on negative returns to the slope coefficients on positive returns in a reverse regression of earnings on returns. The calculation of these seven attributes is based on indicators (items) and financial formulas as employed in previous studies (Francis et al, 2004;Gaio and Raposo, 2014;Latif et al, 2017). Based on Lee and Roh (2012) and Wang and Huynh (2014) this research measures corporate performance (COP) as accounting-based performance, which is evaluated on ROA (after-tax rate of return on total assets) and ROE (after-tax rate of return on shareholders" equity).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%