“…Regarding the effect of conservatism on CASH, there are two opinions, the first opinion supports a positive association between them, since some prior studies interested in International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting ISSN 2162-3082 2019 determining reasons of conservatism existence, one of them is decreasing information asymmetry (IA) (Watts, 2003, Kim et al, 2013, Machdar & Mayangsari, 2015, Balakrishnan et al, 2016, Atlawel and Shaheen, 2017and Isniawati et al, 2018, since conservatism reduces both IA and morally hazardous agency conflicts between managers and less informed other related parties (Opler et al, 1999), this reduction pushes these parties to decrease cost of capital due to mitigating interests' conflicts between owners, managers and debt holders as a result from decreasing risk related to pay excessive dividends (Ahmed et al, 2002, Ball and Shivakumar, 2005, and Lara et al, 2011. In the other dimension, according to transaction model also, there is a negative association between IA and CASH, since increasing IA due to decreasing conservatism decreases shareholders trust in management, which pushes to increase the cost of capital (Ahmed et al, 2002, Chung et al, 2015and Shin et al, 2017, management is forced to decrease CASH to cover the increase in the cost of capital. Dittmar and Mahrt-Smith (2007) confirms this result when they mention that firms with good shareholders protection rights have half CASH of firms with poor shareholder protection rights.…”