“…In this regard, museum specimens can be considered genomic resources (McCormack, Rodríguez-Gómez, Tsai, & Faircloth, 2017) and can be used for diverse types of studies. Examples of such studies are fine-scale population genomics and genotyping (Bi et al, 2013;Lim & Braun, 2016), genome sequencing (Staats et al, 2013), metagenomics (Der Sarkissian et al, 2017), epigenomics (Rubi, Knowles, & Dantzer, 2019), barcoding (Miller, Beentjes, van Helsdingen, & IJland, 2013); Prosser, deWaard, Miller, & Hebert, 2016), species delimitation (Hedin, Derkarabetian, Blair, & Paquin, 2018;Kehlmaier et al, 2019), and phylogenomics (Blaimer, Lloyd, Guillory, & Brady, 2016;Hedin, Derkarabetian, Ramírez, Vink, & Bond, 2018;Ruane & Austin, 2017;Sproul & Maddison, 2017;Starrett et al, 2017;Wood, González, Lloyd, Coddington, & Scharff, 2018), including phylogenomic studies that incorporate genetic data from rare, endangered and/or extinct taxa held in historical collections (Hedin, Derkarabetian, Blair, et al, 2018;Oliveros et al, 2019;Tsai et al, 2019). This was not the case just a few years ago, when historical museum samples were not routinely used for molecular work.…”