2007
DOI: 10.1029/2006jd007713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earth reflectance and polarization intercomparison between SCIAMACHY onboard Envisat and POLDER onboard ADEOS‐2

Abstract: [1] In this paper, we compare reflectance and polarization measurements from two different satellite instruments, namely, the imager Polarization and Directionality of the Earth's Reflectances (POLDER) and the spectrometer Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography (SCIAMACHY). Both instruments are able to measure not only the Earth reflectance but also the state of linear polarization of the detected light. The aim of this paper is to validate the SCIAMACHY reflectance and polarizat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is good agreement between the SCIAMACHY and OMI surface LER databases. The radiometric calibration of the SCIAMACHY instrument has been studied and improved much in the past, using satellite intercomparisons [ Acarreta and Stammes , ; Noël et al , ; von Hoyningen‐Huene et al , ; Kokhanovsky et al , ; Tilstra and Stammes , , ; Jourdan et al , ] and comparisons with radiative transfer calculations [ van Soest et al , ; Tilstra et al , ]. The radiometric calibration of GOME‐2 on the other hand has received much less attention.…”
Section: Discussion and Error Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is good agreement between the SCIAMACHY and OMI surface LER databases. The radiometric calibration of the SCIAMACHY instrument has been studied and improved much in the past, using satellite intercomparisons [ Acarreta and Stammes , ; Noël et al , ; von Hoyningen‐Huene et al , ; Kokhanovsky et al , ; Tilstra and Stammes , , ; Jourdan et al , ] and comparisons with radiative transfer calculations [ van Soest et al , ; Tilstra et al , ]. The radiometric calibration of GOME‐2 on the other hand has received much less attention.…”
Section: Discussion and Error Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sci. 2019, 9,1424 3 of 14 linear polarization (AoLP) describes the oscillation direction of the linear polarized light [13]. As we know, the polarization information (DoLP, AoLP) of the light can be measured by using a rotating linear analyzer [14].…”
Section: The Multichannel Polarimetric Cameramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has many technological advantages, such as a high maturity and stability, wide spectral range, and large field of view.At present, the commonly used on-orbit calibration methods include the scene calibration, the on-board polarized light source method and the spaceborne linear polarization method. The Polarization and Directionality of the Earth's Reflectance (POLDER) and the Directional Polarized Camera (DPC) has adopted the scene calibration [9,10]. When the polarimetric camera observes the atmosphere in a specific angle, the light reflected by the atmosphere is close to the unpolarized light.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radiometric calibration of SCIAMACHY has received much attention in the past. Many efforts were made to study and improve the radiometric calibration using satellite intercomparisons [ Acarreta and Stammes , 2005; Noël et al , 2007a; von Hoyningen‐Huene et al , 2007; Kokhanovsky et al , 2007; Tilstra and Stammes , 2006, 2007; Jourdan et al , 2007] and comparisons with radiative transfer calculations [ van Soest et al , 2005; Tilstra et al , 2005]. These studies were all based on data from up to a few years after launch, for which instrument degradation is not such an issue, or they were focused on wavelengths outside the UV wavelength range, where the impact of instrument degradation is small.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%