1984
DOI: 10.1109/tpas.1984.318254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earth Resistivity Measurement Interpretation Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This fluctuation of the phase angle is not only affected by rod dimension but also soil characteristic that influence by its mineralogy [24] -Grounding Impedance for L = 100 cm Figure 10. Grounding Impedance Vs Log Frequency for L = 100 cm Figure 10 shows that grounding impedance for L = 100 cm and at low frequency up until 10 kHz is relatively constant but at frequency of more than 10 kHz the grounding impedance starts to increase gradually and at f = 100 kHz it increases significantly and becoming very fluctuated with around five peaks, which means that that the distributed equivalent circuit is suitable for presenting the grounding systems such as Figure 1 (d) above as stated by Dawalibi and Mukedar [12].…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysis A Experimental Results Datamentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This fluctuation of the phase angle is not only affected by rod dimension but also soil characteristic that influence by its mineralogy [24] -Grounding Impedance for L = 100 cm Figure 10. Grounding Impedance Vs Log Frequency for L = 100 cm Figure 10 shows that grounding impedance for L = 100 cm and at low frequency up until 10 kHz is relatively constant but at frequency of more than 10 kHz the grounding impedance starts to increase gradually and at f = 100 kHz it increases significantly and becoming very fluctuated with around five peaks, which means that that the distributed equivalent circuit is suitable for presenting the grounding systems such as Figure 1 (d) above as stated by Dawalibi and Mukedar [12].…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysis A Experimental Results Datamentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It is also identified that different sizes of diameters (20, 30, and 40 cm) did not resulted in different value of grounding impedance. For this condition, the "lumped" equivalent circuit can be chosen for representing grounding system such as figure 1(c) above [12]. When tested at frequency between 90-400 kHz the grounding impedance for D = 20 cm is bigger than D = 30 cm, and for D = 30 cm is bigger than D = 40 cm (see red circle 2(a), Figure 6.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysis A Experimental Results Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wenner [10], onde quatro eletrodos igualmente espaçados de distância a sobre uma reta são cravados no solo e a corrente elétrica Í e injetada em um dos eletrodos externo e colhida no outro, como ilustrado na Figura 4, sendo medida a diferença de potencial V entre os dois eletrodos internos [12].…”
Section: Validação Em Geoprospecçãounclassified
“…There are many analytical methods and formulas of earth resistances have been proposed in the literature, Dwight [5] listed the earth resistance formula for one-layer, Nahman and Djordjevic [1] and Chow et al [2] listed the earth resistance for two layers of soil, Gonos and Stathopulos [3] and Dawalibi and Blattner [4] for multi-layer of earth. In this present research, the resistance value is obtained using the formulas from Chow et al [2] for the two layers soil.…”
Section: Earth Resistance Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%