1956
DOI: 10.4294/jpe1952.4.63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earthquake Energy, Earthquake Volume, Aftershock Area, and Strength of the Earth's Crust

Abstract: Various facts appear to suggest that one continuous field of mechanical stress developed in the earth's crust has a certain upper limit for its voluminal extent. The ultimate mechanical stress energy that can be stored up in this whole volume until a breakdown takes place in it may be identified with the energy of the largest possible earthquake. The energy deduced on this hypothesis agrees well with those of the actual largest earth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our extensive resolution tests show that such a temporal variation of the low-V anomaly under the Wen-An source area can hardly be detected reliably by using the sparse ray path coverage in our present data sets which contain errors in both the hypocenter locations and arrival times. Tsuboi (1956) proposed a concept of earthquake volume, that is, the rupture nucleation zone should not be only limited within a 2-D volume but may have a 3-D spatial extent. According to the scaling law of Kanamori and Anderson (1975), if the spatial extent of the source zone of a M = 6-8 earthquake varies from about 10 km to over 100 km (Zhao et al, 2002), then that of the source Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our extensive resolution tests show that such a temporal variation of the low-V anomaly under the Wen-An source area can hardly be detected reliably by using the sparse ray path coverage in our present data sets which contain errors in both the hypocenter locations and arrival times. Tsuboi (1956) proposed a concept of earthquake volume, that is, the rupture nucleation zone should not be only limited within a 2-D volume but may have a 3-D spatial extent. According to the scaling law of Kanamori and Anderson (1975), if the spatial extent of the source zone of a M = 6-8 earthquake varies from about 10 km to over 100 km (Zhao et al, 2002), then that of the source Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second way in which the maximum magnitude may be estimated is from the maximum fault area for the faults within the zone and empirical relations between fault areas and magnitude or moment (Utsu & Seki 1954;Tsuboi 1956;Bath & Duda 1964;Press 1967as in Thatcher & Hanks 1973Kanamori & Anderson 1975;Burr & Solomon 1978;Acharya 1979 Sovanco and Nootka transform faults and slightly less for the Dellwood area faults. A fault width of 4 k m and 1:ngth of about 300 km gives a maximum magnitude of about 7.1 for the longer Blanco, Mendocino and Gulf of California transform faults.…”
Section: -0mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rupture nucleation zone should have a three-dimensional spatial extent, not just limited to the two-dimensional surface of a fault, as suggested earlier by Tsuboi [32] in the concept of earthquake volume. Complex physical and chemical reactions will take place in the source zone of a future earthquake, causing heterogeneities in the material property and stress field, which can be detected with seismic tomography and other geophysical methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%