2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-012-0201-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earthquake hazards and community resilience in Baluchistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
75
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
75
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the existing resilience indicators measure urban resilience from an ecological or engineering perspective [38,45,52,55,56] for specific disturbances [38,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] or for only a part of the system [58,[60][61][62], we have developed a new conceptual framework to measure social-ecological urban resilience. In order to select indicators, we first identified key factors that affect urban resilience and how they affect the system's resilience [39] as variables of our index.…”
Section: Key Factor For Sustaining Resilience In Urban Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the existing resilience indicators measure urban resilience from an ecological or engineering perspective [38,45,52,55,56] for specific disturbances [38,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] or for only a part of the system [58,[60][61][62], we have developed a new conceptual framework to measure social-ecological urban resilience. In order to select indicators, we first identified key factors that affect urban resilience and how they affect the system's resilience [39] as variables of our index.…”
Section: Key Factor For Sustaining Resilience In Urban Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we mentioned in Section 1, most urban resilience indexes are composed of social, economic, institutional and physical resilience dimensions [38,[45][46][47][53][54][55], measured in turn by several indicators. However, these indexes do not apply a social-ecological framework, and most indicators refer to the capacity to persist or return to a previous state in the face of a specific disturbance, usually natural disasters.…”
Section: Indicator Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many of the papers in the review cite Norris et al, who distinguish between the following levels of analysis: physical, ecological, social, city, community, and individual (Norris et al, 2008). In the context of disaster management, resilience is most often studied at the community level (Ainuddin & Routray, 2012;Chen, Ferng, Wang, Wu, & Wang, 2008;Cutter, Ash, & Emrich, 2014;Felsenstein & Lichter, 2014;Frazier, Thompson, Dezzani, & Butsick, 2013;Kafle, 2012). In the context of disasters, individual resilience is the second most prevalent level of analysis and the one most often studied in the medical and psychological literature (cf., Chang & Taormina 2011;Eisenman et al, 2014;Livanou et al, 2005;Rodriguez-Llanes, Vos, & Guha-Sapir, 2013;Van der Velden, Wong, Boshuizen, & Grievink, 2013).…”
Section: Levels Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ROUTRAY, 2012;CARPENTER, 2015;JOERIN et al, 2012;TANG et al, 2015); o impacto das mudanças climáticas (BROWN; DAYAL; RIO, 2012;JABAREEN, 2013;KHAILANI;PERERA, 2013;KLEIN;NICHOLLS;THOMALLA, 2003); e (c) desastres naturais específicos, como inundações (GUPTA, 2007;LHOMME et al, 2013;LIAO, 2012;SUASSUNA, 2014;SUDMEIER;JABOYEDOFF;JAQUET, 2013 …”
unclassified