2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11803-012-0126-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earthquake induced pounding between adjacent buildings considering soil-structure interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because structure frames pounding without bumper involves concrete-to-concrete impact, an improved Kelvin model proposed by Jankowski 21 is utilized to simulate pounding responses of adjacent buildings. The method is widely used by many studies and its effectiveness has been proved by several studies such as Polycarpou and Komodromos 31 and Naserkhaki et al 32 The expression of the pounding force model regarding to concrete-to-concrete impact is shown as 18…”
Section: Pounding Force Model Of Structural Pounding Without Bumpermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because structure frames pounding without bumper involves concrete-to-concrete impact, an improved Kelvin model proposed by Jankowski 21 is utilized to simulate pounding responses of adjacent buildings. The method is widely used by many studies and its effectiveness has been proved by several studies such as Polycarpou and Komodromos 31 and Naserkhaki et al 32 The expression of the pounding force model regarding to concrete-to-concrete impact is shown as 18…”
Section: Pounding Force Model Of Structural Pounding Without Bumpermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muthukumar et al [13] studied the seismic pounding response of adjacent buildings applying various impact models and introduced Hertz damp model for pounding impacts. Naserkhaki et al [14] used a visco-elastic contact model to simulate the pounding force for adjacent buildings resting on the soil. Naderpour et al [15] presented the nonlinear viscoelastic model of impact force with the considered relation between the coefficients of restitution and damping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural design codes indeed regulate seismic separation requirements for adjacent buildings; however, the risk of building pounding is still high [14]. Moreover, the impact of the pounding effect is not taken into consideration in practical design codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study [37], it was shown that the code-prescribed width of the separation joint is not sufficient on soft soils especially when the fundamental periods of the soil and structure were close to each other and also to the excitation frequency due to resonance phenomenon. Naserkhaki et al [38] developed a model consisting of adjacent shear buildings responding in elastic range resting on equivalent springs and dampers. They observed that pounding and SSSI together resulted in a more severe response in terms of maximum shear and displacements of top floor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%