2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.11.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earthquake nucleation and triggering on an optimally oriented fault

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6) mainshocks, even though Love-wave triggering is also predicted by the Coulomb triggering model, because the waves from both earthquakes have near strike-parallel incidence on the EDF (Hill, 2012). Specifically for the Indian Ocean mainshock, we could not confirm Love-wave triggering visually due to overlapping seismic waves from the triggered M w 3.9 Nenana earthquake in central Alaska (Tape et al, 2013). Nor could we identify evidence for triggered tremor in a higher frequency band (see Ⓔ Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6) mainshocks, even though Love-wave triggering is also predicted by the Coulomb triggering model, because the waves from both earthquakes have near strike-parallel incidence on the EDF (Hill, 2012). Specifically for the Indian Ocean mainshock, we could not confirm Love-wave triggering visually due to overlapping seismic waves from the triggered M w 3.9 Nenana earthquake in central Alaska (Tape et al, 2013). Nor could we identify evidence for triggered tremor in a higher frequency band (see Ⓔ Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…The Indian Ocean mainshock has triggered many microearthquakes and tremor around the world (e.g., Wu et al, 2012), as well as a transient global increase of M w ≥ 5:5 earthquakes (Pollitz et al, 2012). Its Love wave also triggered an M w 3.9 earthquake in central Alaska (Tape et al, 2013), which was recorded by stations in our study region at ∼2700 s after the Indian Ocean mainshock. We observed consecutive bursts of tectonic tremor triggered by the long-period Rayleigh wave between 3500 and 4000 s after the Indian Ocean mainshock in the 1-10 Hz frequency band (Fig.…”
Section: Additional Observations Of Triggered Tremormentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[53] These lab observations may provide some physical insight into the mechanics of foreshocks, particularly short-term foreshocks and tremor-like signals sometimes observed to emanate from the eventual hypocenter of a larger earthquake [e.g., Bouchon et al, 2011;Tape et al, 2013]. Stressing rate dependence to frictional stability may help explain the radiation of tectonic tremor and certain characteristics of repeating earthquake sequences [Matsuzawa et al, 2012].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, clusters or swarms of small earthquakes have been detected within a few kilometers of the eventual hypocenter of a main shock in the weeks to seconds before earthquakes [e.g., Dodge et al 1995, 1996, Zanzerkia et al, 2003, Bouchon et al, 2011, Chiaraluce et al, 2011, Miyazaki et al, 2011Ando and Imanishi, 2011;Marsan and Enescu, 2012;Tape et al, 2013]. While they are termed foreshocks, the precise physical connection between foreshocks and main shocks is not well established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A clue to the triggering power of the April 2012 event lies in the apparent triggering of a foreshock sequence ∼20 s prior to an M 3.9 dynamically triggered aftershock in Alaska (Tape et al, 2013). This suggests that source patches that are close to failure may exhibit a gradual precursory slip prior to generating a larger triggered event.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%