2019
DOI: 10.3390/buildings9110228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earthquake Response of Cold-Formed Steel-Based Building Systems: An Overview of the Current State of the Art

Abstract: Building systems fabricated with cold-formed steel (CFS) profiles and members made of wood, gypsum, or other materials allow solving a range of issues arising in common constructional elements thanks to their advantages, such as lightness, strength, durability, physical stability, sustainability, and cost-effectiveness. As a result of this inherent competitiveness of CFS based buildings, their use has been gradually increasing in recent years both in the field of structural systems as non-structural architectu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of cold-formed steel (CFS) elements in wall panel systems has been gradually increasing in recent years both in the field of structural systems and as non-structural architectural components. This is due to their high strength-to-weight ratio, cost-effectiveness, prefabrication and fast assembling on-site, environmental protection and good seismic performance [1][2][3]. The connections between the floor structures and the wall panels remain questionable due to the high level of fabrication of the panels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of cold-formed steel (CFS) elements in wall panel systems has been gradually increasing in recent years both in the field of structural systems and as non-structural architectural components. This is due to their high strength-to-weight ratio, cost-effectiveness, prefabrication and fast assembling on-site, environmental protection and good seismic performance [1][2][3]. The connections between the floor structures and the wall panels remain questionable due to the high level of fabrication of the panels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For previous studies about CFS systems, Sani et al provided a review on roof trusses constructed using CFS [ 15 ], and Sharafi et al focused on the research and advancements made in the lateral resistance of lightweight steel frames [ 16 ]. In addition, Di Lorenzo and De Martino provided an outline of the CFS non-structural architectural and structural systems’ existing codification and ongoing research [ 17 ]. Other authors like Amsyar et al gathered and reviewed prior studies on composite joints for CFS structures, focusing on three distinctive topics: composite beam-to-column and beam-to-slab joints, and beam-to-column joints [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seismic behavior of CFS frame structures has been investigated by many research (Schafer et al 2016;Dubina. 2008;Di Lorenzo and Martino. 2019;Fiorino, Iuorio and Landolfo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%