2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07118-3_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earthquake Risk Assessment: Present Shortcomings and Future Directions

Abstract: This paper looks at the current practices in regional and portfolio seismic risk assessment, discusses some of their shortcomings and presents proposals for improving the state-of-the-practice in the future. Both scenario-based and probabilistic risk assessment are addressed, and modelling practices in the hazard, fragility/ vulnerability and exposure components are presented and critiqued. The subsequent recommendations for improvements to the practice and necessary future research are mainly focused on treat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exposure uncertainty has previously been identified as an important area of research (Crowley, 2014), and we already introduced a framework for stochastic treatment of location uncertainty in a recent paper (Scheingraber and Käser, 2019). In our framework, locations of risk items without precise coordinate location information are sampled with replacement from a weighted irregular grid inside their corresponding administrative zone.…”
Section: Portfolio Location Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure uncertainty has previously been identified as an important area of research (Crowley, 2014), and we already introduced a framework for stochastic treatment of location uncertainty in a recent paper (Scheingraber and Käser, 2019). In our framework, locations of risk items without precise coordinate location information are sampled with replacement from a weighted irregular grid inside their corresponding administrative zone.…”
Section: Portfolio Location Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplicity of this concept may be misleading, since often neither the overall number of buildings nor the proportions of the different building vulnerability classes are available, and exposure models are often spatially aggregated, that is, all assets in an aggregation unit (e.g. an administrative zone) are associated with a single geographical location (see, for example, Crowley, 2014; Silva, 2016). Furthermore, although exposure and vulnerability should be treated as separate concepts, in any practical application they are strongly interlinked.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earthquake hazard assessment calculates the probability of ground shaking across a region primarily in deterministic or probabilistic approaches. Deterministic approaches are scenario-based without uncertainties such as ground motion, in which a single seismic event is identified, whereas the development of probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA) takes possible uncertainties into account besides all potential deterministic earthquake scenarios with their likelihood of occurrence [15][16][17]. A PSHA may be carried out for a given region to reveal various levels of ground shaking with a corresponding exceedance probability within a time interval or a return period [18,19], by which an earthquake hazard map can be plotted based on the standard building codes in most countries, usually for the ground shaking to be reached or exceeded with a 10% probability in 50 years or an average recurrence of such ground motions every 475 years [13,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the exposure and vulnerability of people and property are also essential for earthquake risk assessment. Exposure evaluation captures the spatial distribution of the people and property exposed to the seismic hazards as well as their value, the development of which mainly focuses on the data collection and measurement of exposure [7,16,22]. Vulnerability generally describes the susceptibility of the exposed building stock to adverse seismic impacts expressed as the probability of loss ratio conditional on a group of ground-shaking levels [14,16] and existing studies develop around physical or structural seismic vulnerability [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation