1967
DOI: 10.1016/0040-1951(67)90043-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earthquakes and fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
114
1
3

Year Published

1968
1968
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
12
114
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The b-values of the power-law portions of each distribution, however, remained constant. In our model, by contrast, both thc degree of enhancement and the b-value vary systematically with heterogeneity; the latter has also been observed in acoustic emission experiments [Mogi, 1967] The observation that heterogeneity is required to stop rupture supports both the contention [Rice, 1993] …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The b-values of the power-law portions of each distribution, however, remained constant. In our model, by contrast, both thc degree of enhancement and the b-value vary systematically with heterogeneity; the latter has also been observed in acoustic emission experiments [Mogi, 1967] The observation that heterogeneity is required to stop rupture supports both the contention [Rice, 1993] …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Strong support for this idea has been obtained by recent statistical earthquake and fracture studies e.g. in Japan (Mogi 1967). In this connection it might be necessary to point out that the compilation of the fracture-tectonic map was done without any comparison to the seismic map (Fig.…”
Section: Fracture-tectonicsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Case histories analyze individual foreshock sequences, most of them being chosen a posteriori to suggest that foreshock patterns observed in acoustic emissions preceding rupture in the laboratory could apply to earthquakes [Mogi, 1963;1967]. A few statistical tests validate the significance of reported anomalies on b-value of foreshocks.…”
Section: Magnitude Distribution Of Foreshocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But because aftershocks exist on all scales, from the laboratory scale, e.g. [Mogi, 1967;Scholz, 1968], to the worldwide seismicity, we may expect that all earthquakes, whatever their magnitude, trigger their own aftershocks, but with a rate increasing with the mainshock magnitude, so that only aftershocks of the largest earthquakes are identifiable unambiguously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%