“…From this perspective, differences among the clusters of instructional techniques are statistically significant for all four learning aspects --learning effectiveness (df=3, F=31.02, p<.001); comfort (df=3, F=113.49, p<.000); familiarity (df=3, F=28.80, p<.001); and knowledge transfer (df=3, F=5.59, p<.047). Comfort, Familiarity, andKnowledge Transfer Scholars (Aronson, 2002, Biggs 1994;Chow, 1995;Chan1999;Clarke and Gieve, 2006;Cortazzi 2006;Chan and Rao, 2009;Coverdale-Jones andRastall, 2009, Littlewood 2009;Ryan and Slethaug 2010;Rajaram, 2010;Rajaram and Bordia, 2011;Rajaram and Bordia, 2013;Shi 2006;Tang 1996;Turner, 2006 andWen andClement 2003;) have all provided evidence in the literature on learning method preferences for mainland Chinese learners. Few studies have been conducted about how effectively these students perceive to learn using specific (yet commonly used) groups of learning/teaching techniques that explicitly focus on a holistic coverage of a) to include a well balanced and mixed sample size which include students from varying cultural, social backgrounds, differing business programs, age and gender; b) western-based curriculum and teaching/learning approaches to be measured against in a cosmopolitan, developed with high influence of western values yet having the rooted CHC values country.…”