Eastern Carolina Asthma Prevention Program (ECAPP): An Environmental Intervention Study among Rural and Underserved Children with Asthma in Eastern North Carolina

Abstract

OBJECTIVEAsthma is the most common chronic childhood condition affecting 6.3 million (US) children aged less than 18 years. Home-based, multi-component, environmental intervention studies among children with asthma have demonstrated to be effective in reducing asthma symptoms. In this study, a local hospital and university developed an environmental intervention research pilot project, Eastern Carolina Asthma Prevention Program (ECAPP), to evaluate self-reported asthma symptoms, breathing measurements, and number of asthma-related emergency department (ED) visits among low-income, minority children with asthma living in rural, eastern North Carolina. Our goal was to develop a conceptual model and demonstrate any asthma respiratory improvements in children associated with our home-based, environmental intervention.METHODSThis project used a single cohort, intervention design approach to compare self-reported asthma-related symptoms, breathing tests, and ED visits over a 6 month period between children with asthma in an intervention study group (n = 12) and children with asthma in a control study group (n = 7). The intervention study group received intense asthma education, three home visits, 2 week follow-up telephone calls, and environmental intervention products for reducing asthma triggers in the home. The control group received education at baseline and 2 week calls, but no intervention products.RESULTSAt the end of the study period, significant improvements were observed in the intervention group compared with the control group. Overall, the intervention group experienced a 58% (46 ± SD 26.9) reduction in self-reported asthma symptoms; 76% (34 ± SD 29.7) decrease in rescue medicine; 12% (145 ± SD 11.3) increase in controller medicine; 37% decrease in mean exhaled nitric oxide levels and 33% fewer ED asthma-related visits.CONCLUSIONAs demonstrated, a combination of efforts appeared effective for improving asthma respiratory symptoms among children in the intervention group. ECAPP is a low cost pilot project that could readily be adapted and expanded into other communities throughout eastern North Carolina. Future efforts could include enhanced partnerships between environmental health professionals at local health departments and pediatric asthma programs at hospitals to carry out ECAPP.

Community-based interventions for childhood asthma using comprehensive approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis

“…Many studies have evaluated the impact of interventions targeting asthma triggers in the home environment. Although improvement in asthma symptoms and urgent care visits were consistently reported across the studies, level of asthma control and hospital admissions due to asthma were uncertain [38][39][40]. Furthermore, families receiving home-based interventions were often supplied with environmental remediation products (e.g.…”

Rural Asthma: Current Understanding of Prevalence, Patterns, and Interventions for Children and Adolescents

“…After 2 years, program participants demonstrated improvements in lung function and a significant decrease in emergency department visits (158 to 4), hospitalizations (62 to 1), and average school day absences (17 to 8.8 days) [63••]. Similar multi-component programs have also demonstrated increases in controller medicine and reduction in self-reported asthma symptoms, at low cost [64]. …”

Asthma-Related Emergency Department Visits in North Carolina, 2010–2014

“…With the recent loss of federal asthma funding to the North Carolina Division of Public Health, county health departments have less state-level support for asthma education efforts to raise awareness in their communities. Concentrated efforts by programs such as Mission Children's Hospital [26], Community Care of North Carolina-Wake/Johnston Counties [27], and the Eastern Carolina Asthma Prevention Program [28] have shown tremendous benefit to those with asthma through home-based education and intervention efforts. Programs like these represent good models to follow to lower the asthma burden throughout North Carolina communities, but more funding and resources are needed to keep these programs in motion.…”