2020
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpaa153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eastern US deciduous tree species respond dissimilarly to declining soil moisture but similarly to rising evaporative demand

Abstract: Hydraulic stress in plants occurs under conditions of low water availability (soil moisture; θ) and/or high atmospheric-demand for water (vapor pressure deficit; D). Different species are adapted to respond to hydraulic stress by functioning along a continuum where at one end they close stomata to maintain a constant leaf water potential (ΨL) (isohydric species), and at the other they allow ΨL to decline (anisohydric species). Differences in water use along this continuum are most notable during hydrologic str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
11
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Dryness stress on ecosystem production has often been characterized by low soil water content (SWC) and high atmospheric water demand (i.e., vapor pressure deficit, VPD; Liu et al, 2020). The impacts of VPD and SWC on plants have been studied in recent years against the background of global warming (Chen et al, 2021; Denham et al, 2021). However, the dominance of VPD versus SWC on plant water stress is still under debate (Fu et al, 2022; Liu et al, 2020; Sulman et al, 2016; Yuan et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dryness stress on ecosystem production has often been characterized by low soil water content (SWC) and high atmospheric water demand (i.e., vapor pressure deficit, VPD; Liu et al, 2020). The impacts of VPD and SWC on plants have been studied in recent years against the background of global warming (Chen et al, 2021; Denham et al, 2021). However, the dominance of VPD versus SWC on plant water stress is still under debate (Fu et al, 2022; Liu et al, 2020; Sulman et al, 2016; Yuan et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that Q. alba had particularly high P50 (consistent with previous work: Kannenberg et al, 2019; Maherali et al, 2006) but were also more anisohydric. We used the variation in Ψ L to quantify the degree of isohydricity to incorporate stomatal responses to both declining soil water and increasing D , noting that the latter is the predominant factor limiting conductance for these sites and species (Denham et al, 2021; Novick et al, 2016; Yi et al, 2019). However, prior work using other approaches for quantifying isohydricity in these study sites and elsewhere also concludes that Quercus species are more anisohydric than many of their codominant counterparts (Abrams, 1990; Cavender‐Bares & Bazzaz, 2000; Ewers et al, 2007; Kannenberg et al, 2019; Meinzer et al, 2013; Roman et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altogether, it appears that Q. alba sustain high rates of gas exchange at the cost of operating with damaging water potential gradients and low Ψ safety . Moreover, much of the variability in stomatal conductance and water potential for eastern US trees, and especially Quercus species, are determined by the dynamics of D (Denham et al, 2021; Novick et al, 2019; Yi et al, 2019). Thus, these species may be particularly vulnerable to hydraulic dysfunction linked to future droughts that will be characterized by increasingly high D (Ficklin & Novick, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations