2012
DOI: 10.1109/mmm.2012.2205833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Easy-to-Swallow Wireless Telemetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 = σ S/m. However, through measurements of the reflection coefficient, i.e., 11 S parameter, we verified that the insulated dipoles covered properly the 2.36-2.5 GHz frequency band when submerged in our liquid phantom described above (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Phantom Aqueous Solutionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 = σ S/m. However, through measurements of the reflection coefficient, i.e., 11 S parameter, we verified that the insulated dipoles covered properly the 2.36-2.5 GHz frequency band when submerged in our liquid phantom described above (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Phantom Aqueous Solutionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Although the expected radio propagation losses through biological tissues in the MICS band may not be as high as within 2360-2400 MHz or 2400-2483.5 MHz, the maximal channel bandwidth of 300 kHz allowed in the MICS band constrains the implantable devices to low data rate transmissions. Therefore, a number of other frequency bands have been considered for communication interfaces with medical implants and in-body electronic pills [11]- [13]. Wider channel bandwidths for novel and more sophisticated in-body wireless sensors and actuators may be exploited in frequency bands above 1 GHz at the expense of larger propagation losses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This consideration corresponds to some practical in-body medical sensor applications like the WCE, in which quasiomnidirectional antennas are used to establish the IB2OB radio communication link because of the unpredictable orientation that the device can have as it travels inside the gastrointestinal (GI) tract [4]- [6].…”
Section: A In-body (Ib) Probing Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in the Section I, spectrum regulations constrain the utilization of UWB to 3.1-10.6 GHz for indoor and outdoor propagation environments. Nevertheless, regulating the use of 1-3 GHz for in-body UWB transmissions [23] would be highly beneficial for the use of this RF technology in applications that demand high data transmission rates like the WCE [4]- [6]. …”
Section: Path Loss Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation