2003
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8276.00507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eating at School: How the National School Lunch Program Affects Children's Diets

Abstract: This article examines the impact of participation in the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) on children's dietary intake at lunchtime and over 24 hours. Using a fixed effects model to control for selection bias, we find that NSLP participation leads to increased 24-hour intake of six vitamins and minerals—calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, zinc, vitamin B12, and riboflavin—as well as dietary fiber. Participation also leads to a trade-off between children's intake of dietary fat and added sugars whereby particip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
84
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
84
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, a nutritionally balanced meal provided early in the day can improve student health when the meal received otherwise is inferior. Some research suggests greater levels of health and nutrient intake can benefit student cognitive performance, improving academic performance and learning efficacy (Kleinman et al, 2002;Gleason and Suitor, 2003;Florence et al, 2008, Kawafha, 2013. Second, the incentive of meal provision-in addition to improved health and nutrition-may reduce tardiness and have positive effects on overall student attendance rates (Kleinman et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, a nutritionally balanced meal provided early in the day can improve student health when the meal received otherwise is inferior. Some research suggests greater levels of health and nutrient intake can benefit student cognitive performance, improving academic performance and learning efficacy (Kleinman et al, 2002;Gleason and Suitor, 2003;Florence et al, 2008, Kawafha, 2013. Second, the incentive of meal provision-in addition to improved health and nutrition-may reduce tardiness and have positive effects on overall student attendance rates (Kleinman et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third group is most relevant to our study. Within this group, Gleason and Suitor (2003) focus on NSLP participation and use student-level fixed effects to control for nonrandom selection. The authors find that NSLP participation increases intake of nutrients, but also increases intake of dietary fat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4.3 catalogs the studies we review. Gleason and Suitor (2003) compare observations of dietary intake for an individual across multiple days that vary by whether the student does or does not receive a school lunch, and find mixed evidence on nutrition intake. They find that NSLP increases the consumption of fat, protein, and six types of vitamins and minerals, but that it has no overall impact on total calories eaten at lunch or over a 24-hour period.…”
Section: Research On Nslpmentioning
confidence: 99%