Eating breakfast is associated with weight loss during an intensive lifestyle intervention for overweight/obesity

Duan, Daisy; Pilla, Scott J.; Michalski, Kathy; Laferrère, Blandine; Clark, Jeanne M.; Maruthur, Nisa M.

doi:10.1002/oby.23340

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 40 publications

(68 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is supported by a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational and longitudinal studies, which showed an increased relative risk of overweight/obesity when breakfast was skipped [ 17 ]. Furthermore, a few studies reported that skipping breakfast was linked to increased levels of fasting insulin, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [ 18 , 19 ]. In agreement with these observations, an intervention study in women with obesity showed that consuming the most calories of the day (700 kcal) during breakfast led to greater weight loss as compared to an evening-loaded diet [ 20 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Early and Late Time-Restricted Feeding on Parameters of Metabolic Health: An Explorative Literature Assessment

Petridi,

Geurts,

Nyakayiru

et al. 2024

Nutrients

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Chrono-nutrition (meal timing) aligns food consumption with one’s circadian rhythm. The first meal (e.g., breakfast) likely promotes synchronization of peripheral circadian clocks, thereby supporting metabolic health. Time-restricted feeding (TRF) has been shown to reduce body weight (BW) and/or improve cardiovascular biomarkers. In this explorative literature assessment, 13 TRF randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected from PubMed and Scopus to evaluate the effects of early (eTRF: first meal before 10:30 a.m.) and late TRF (lTRF: first meal after 11:30 a.m.) on parameters of metabolic health. Although distinct variations in study design were evident between reports, TRF consistently decreased energy intake (EI) and BW, and improved insulin resistance as well as systolic blood pressure. eTRF seemed to have a greater beneficial effect than lTRF on insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Importantly, most studies did not appear to consider chronotype in their evaluation, which may have underestimated TRF effects. TRF intervention may be a promising approach for risk reduction of human metabolic diseases. To conclusively determine benefits of TRF and identify clear differences between eTRF and lTRF, future studies should be longer-term (≥8 weeks) with well-defined (differences in) feeding windows, include participants chronotypically matching the intervention, and compare outcomes to those of control groups without any dietary limitations.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Early and Late Time-Restricted Feeding on Parameters of Metabolic Health: An Explorative Literature Assessment

Petridi,

Geurts,

Nyakayiru

et al. 2024

Nutrients

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Translation, adaptation and validation of the Chrononutrition Profile – Questionnaire (CP-Q) in Brazilian Portuguese

Lira

Araújo

Medeiros

et al. 2023

Chronobiology International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Frequency of breakfast consumption is associated with anthropometric markers of body adiposity in university students

Silva,

Pereira,

Fonseca

et al. 2024

Rev. Nutr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To analyze the frequency of breakfast consumption and its association with body adiposity in university students. Methods Cross-sectional study using baseline data from a cohort of 2,179 students aged 16 to 25, enrolled in 21 full-time courses, collected between 2015 and 2018. The outcomes assessed were overweight, obesity, high waist circumference and high waist-to-height ratio. The frequency of breakfast consumption was assessed as: regular (5-7 times/week); irregular (1-4 times/week) and omission (never/almost never). Associations were estimated using Poisson regression models with robust variance. Results The prevalence of skipping breakfast and irregular breakfast consumption were, respectively, 14.5% and 23.6% for men and 14.6% and 24.7% for women. In males, skipping breakfast was directly associated with obesity (aPR=1,74; CI95%=1,05;2,88), high waist circumference (aPR=2,10; CI95%=1,31;3,35), and high waist/height ratio (aPR =1,59; CI95%=1,13;2,23). Among women, higher prevalence of obesity (aPR= 1.90, 95%CI= 1.16;3.12) was found among those who had breakfast irregularly, and skipping breakfast was associated with high waist/height ratio (aPR=1,51; CI95%=1,03;2,20). Irregular breakfast consumption was only associated with obesity in women and was not associated with any of the outcomes assessed among men. Conclusion Skipping breakfast was associated with abdominal adiposity in both sexes, and also with total adiposity among men. Irregular breakfast consumption was associated only with obesity in women. Regular breakfast consumption should be included among the objectives of actions to promote healthy eating habits at universities.

show abstract

Eating breakfast is associated with weight loss during an intensive lifestyle intervention for overweight/obesity

Cited by 3 publications

References 40 publications

Effects of Early and Late Time-Restricted Feeding on Parameters of Metabolic Health: An Explorative Literature Assessment

Effects of Early and Late Time-Restricted Feeding on Parameters of Metabolic Health: An Explorative Literature Assessment

Translation, adaptation and validation of the Chrononutrition Profile – Questionnaire (CP-Q) in Brazilian Portuguese

Frequency of breakfast consumption is associated with anthropometric markers of body adiposity in university students

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About