The aim of the current study was to develop, test, and retest two new male body
dissatisfaction scales: The Male Body Scale (MBS; consisting of emaciated
to obese figures) and the Male Fit Body Scale (MFBS; consisting of
emaciated to muscular figures). These scales were compared to the two most commonly used
visually based indices of body dissatisfaction (Stunkard Figure Rating Scale, SFRS; and
Somatomorphic Matrix, SM). Male participants rated which body figure on each scale most
represented their current figure, then their ideal figure, and then rated which one of the
three scales (MBS, MFBS, and SFRS) best represented their current and ideal body overall.
Finally, they completed the Drive for Muscularity Scale (DMS), the Eating Disorder
Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q 6.0), and their actual body composition was calculated.
This was followed by a retest and manipulation check 2 to 6 weeks later. Participants’
actual body mass index, fat- and muscularity-percentage were all highly related to their
current body figure choice, and both new scales were consistently valid and more reliable
between test and retest than the SFRS and SM body dissatisfaction scores. Importantly,
each scale was sensitive to different types of body dissatisfaction within males.
Specifically, the MBS revealed that males’ desire for the thin-ideal significantly
corresponded to higher eating disorder tendencies as identified by EDE-Q 6.0 scores, while
the MFBS revealed much higher body dissatisfaction toward the larger, muscularity-ideal,
predicting higher drive for muscularity as identified by DMS scores. Results validated the
new scales, and inform male-focused eating disorder research.