2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eating quality of beef, from different production systems, assessed by German, Spanish and British consumers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
42
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
42
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The feedlot (22.0%) was the least preferred production system. Cluster analysis Regarding beef acceptability, different groups of consumers exist, which constitute significant market segments that demand beef with different characteristics (Oliver et al, 2006); those segments also occur when consumption habits, preferences for meat choice and attitudes to certain meat attributes are considered (Schnettler et al, 2009;Realini et al, 2013), which is important to know in order to identify different market niches.…”
Section: Consumer Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feedlot (22.0%) was the least preferred production system. Cluster analysis Regarding beef acceptability, different groups of consumers exist, which constitute significant market segments that demand beef with different characteristics (Oliver et al, 2006); those segments also occur when consumption habits, preferences for meat choice and attitudes to certain meat attributes are considered (Schnettler et al, 2009;Realini et al, 2013), which is important to know in order to identify different market niches.…”
Section: Consumer Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is currently much interest in adding value to the beef by reducing the SFA content and increasing the levels of some specific fatty acids (FAs) that may be beneficial for human health, such as oleic acid, CLA and n-3 PUFA (Shingfield et al, 2013). However, because the chemical composition of the meat is directly linked to its quality, modifying the FA profile of intramuscular fat could affect its sensory properties (Oliver et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age at slaughter and carcass weights ranged from 18 to 22 months (323.6 ± 23.2 kg cold carcass weight). For more information about carcass and instrumental meat quality of these beef types, see Montossi & Sañudo (2004) and Oliver et al (2006).…”
Section: Short Communication Sensory Quality Of Beef From Different mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases, the British and the Spanish beef aged 20 days, the results could be explained, at least partially, by the development of relatively faster off flavours that were especially detected by the panel. However, the consumers from UK and ES evaluated, in other study, the same meat with an acceptable quality (Oliver et al, 2006).…”
Section: Short Communication Sensory Quality Of Beef From Different mentioning
confidence: 99%