2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-20044-1_38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EAutoDet: Efficient Architecture Search for Object Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the mAP0.5 value of our method improves by 0.8% compared with YOLOv7. However, the detection capability of our method on satellite remote sensing images is not as good as that of EAutoDet-s [62], FRIoU [63], and PCG-Net [64]. This is because MFEFNet is specifically designed for the features of UAV images, but those methods are specifically designed for the detection of satellite remote sensing images.…”
Section: Extended Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, the mAP0.5 value of our method improves by 0.8% compared with YOLOv7. However, the detection capability of our method on satellite remote sensing images is not as good as that of EAutoDet-s [62], FRIoU [63], and PCG-Net [64]. This is because MFEFNet is specifically designed for the features of UAV images, but those methods are specifically designed for the detection of satellite remote sensing images.…”
Section: Extended Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The method used only 0.35 M network parameters, and the average test time per sample is about 61 ms, thus achieving a balance between performance and speed. Wang et al 29 presented an efficient framework of EAutoDet that can discover practical backbone and FPN architectures for object detection in 1.4 graphics processing unit (GPU) days. They achieved 40.1% mAP@0.5 with 120 frames per second (FPS) and 49.2% mAP@0.5 with 41.3 FPS on the COCO test data set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%