2002
DOI: 10.1017/s0265051702000220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ebb and flow of assessment in music

Abstract: In Scotland, assessment procedures tend to dominate the teaching and learning of music. Teachers are concerned that the recording and measuring of pupils' output against set criteria are achieved at the expense of engaging them in meaningful, creative experiences. The authors have proposed elsewhere (Byrne and Sheridan, 2000) that music educators should consider the use of Csikszentmihalyi's 'flow' model (Csikszentmihalyi, 1992) as a possible reflective tool for monitoring, regulating and assessing learning in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In past decades, important theories and models were developed to discuss music creativity and the framework in which it appears and develops (Csikszentmihalyi, 1996;Elliott, 1995;Sheridan & Byrne, 2002;Swanwick, 1979;Webster, 1992Webster, , 1994Webster, , 2002Webster, , 2003. Researchers have been concerned with the processes by which people-and especially pupils-engage in musical creative activities of composition (e.g.…”
Section: Creativity In Music Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In past decades, important theories and models were developed to discuss music creativity and the framework in which it appears and develops (Csikszentmihalyi, 1996;Elliott, 1995;Sheridan & Byrne, 2002;Swanwick, 1979;Webster, 1992Webster, , 1994Webster, , 2002Webster, , 2003. Researchers have been concerned with the processes by which people-and especially pupils-engage in musical creative activities of composition (e.g.…”
Section: Creativity In Music Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly true for the music curriculum, which seems to derive its 'grown-up' status from the fact that it is assessed in very similar ways to other more 'serious' subjects in the curriculum. The dominance of assessment procedures in Scottish secondary music education has been discussed by Sheridan & Byrne (2002), who raise five key factors that need to be addressed. These are:…”
Section: A S S E S S I N G M U S I C a L C R E A T I V I T Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some implications for educators and learners in the music classroom are explored and a proposed self-directed learning tool is discussed. Some of the issues on the assessment of creativity in music raised by Sheridan & Byrne (2002) are also discussed. This paper highlights the subjective nature of existing assessment procedures, considering whether examiners need extended criteria as opposed to a single dimension of creativity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet they acknowledged that the vision of getting children to evaluate their own work could compromise the opportunity those children had to undertake the experimentation essential to future enjoyment of, or success in, the arts (cf. Sheridan and Byrne 2002). Being driven by the need to assess could also stultify the necessary creative partnership between teacher and pupil: The head teachers saw the lack of a national test for expressive arts as part of the basis of the subjects' appeal for their staff, or part of what made it harder for them to focus on assessment in this area.…”
Section: Pt1mentioning
confidence: 99%