eBird 2022
DOI: 10.2173/ebirdst.2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

eBird Status and Trends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Birdwatcher skill is based on the checklist calibration index, a standardized measure indexing differences in behavior among observers (Johnston et al, 2018; Kelling et al, 2015). The AdaSTEM weekly estimates of relative abundance were available for the year 2020 for 1051 species at a 2.96 × 2.96 km spatial resolution using an equal‐area sinusoidal projection (Fink et al, 2021). Weekly relative abundance estimates were available for all 169 NMP bird species that occur in North America (Horton et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birdwatcher skill is based on the checklist calibration index, a standardized measure indexing differences in behavior among observers (Johnston et al, 2018; Kelling et al, 2015). The AdaSTEM weekly estimates of relative abundance were available for the year 2020 for 1051 species at a 2.96 × 2.96 km spatial resolution using an equal‐area sinusoidal projection (Fink et al, 2021). Weekly relative abundance estimates were available for all 169 NMP bird species that occur in North America (Horton et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used eBird Status and Trends data to estimate the timing of peak migration based on changes in weekly relative abundance (Auer et al 2020; package ebirdst version 0.30, Fink et al 2020b). These annually updated data products use statistical and machine learning models that use observer effort, and temporal and environmental covariates to estimate occurrence and abundance while accounting for variability associated with citizen science data (Fink et al 2020a).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our predictions of high abundance areas in the north agree with what we see on the ground (TL pers. obs) and ebird data (Fink et al 2021). Another area where there is a lack of predicted GGMs is over areas of expansive monoculture crops such as banana and pineapple in the southeast of the ebird range; this is likely because the ebird range is the extent of the range and does not have detail within it.…”
Section: Key Covariates Of Ggm Abundancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Costa Rica, the GGM's range was reduced by ~90% by the end of the 1990s (Chassot and Monge 2002) but may have increased slightly since then (Fink et al 2021). One of the main drivers of this decline was habitat loss and degradation, with the loss of around 90% of the mountain almond (Dipteryx panamensis), a vital food and nesting tree (Monge et al 2003;Chassot et al 2007;Monge et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%