2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0181-6_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EBMT Seen as Case-Based Reasoning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to parallel computing, Sumita and Iida (1991) observed that smarter use of the example-base, in terms of indexing the examples, would improve retrieval speed. Collins and Somers (2003) suggested that "better structured case-memory schemas [are needed] to support smart indexing and case storage" (p. 146), while Nirenburg et al (1993) suggested awarding bonuses for contiguous word matches. Sumita (2003) notes that his parallel approach was improved by following Bown's (2003) clustering approach to automatically generate equivalence classes compared to using hand-coded thesauri.…”
Section: Search/retrievalmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition to parallel computing, Sumita and Iida (1991) observed that smarter use of the example-base, in terms of indexing the examples, would improve retrieval speed. Collins and Somers (2003) suggested that "better structured case-memory schemas [are needed] to support smart indexing and case storage" (p. 146), while Nirenburg et al (1993) suggested awarding bonuses for contiguous word matches. Sumita (2003) notes that his parallel approach was improved by following Bown's (2003) clustering approach to automatically generate equivalence classes compared to using hand-coded thesauri.…”
Section: Search/retrievalmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Lepage and Denoual 2005), example-based methods belong to the tradition of analogical models arising in the mid-1980s under various similar names including "case-based reasoning" (CBR) as in Kolodner (1983a,b), "exemplar-based reasoning" as in Porter and Bareiss (1986) or Kibler and Aha (1997), "instance-based reasoning" as in Aha et al (1991), "memorybased reasoning" as in Stanfill and Waltz (1988), or "analogy-based reasoning" as in Hall (1989) or Veloso and Carbonell (1993). One detailed point-by-point elaboration of EBMT as an application of CBR is given by Collins and Somers (2003). Analogical reasoning at translation runtime is also identified by Turcato and Popowich (2003) as the main distinguishing property of EBMT approaches.…”
Section: What Is Ebmt?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We visualize by shading the fact that, while the first a de (9) corresponds to the first a of (10), on the other hand the first b to the left of the conformity in p in (9) corresponds the second b to the right of the equal sign in (2).…”
Section: A2 Proofs For Reductions A21 General Case Of Multiplication ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular domains such as machine translation, this type of analogical reasoning has been used [35,26] and the connection with case-based reasoning is well recognized [9]. Still in natural language processing, analogy-based approaches have been used for the tasks of morphological analysis [41,42] or word generation [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%