2008
DOI: 10.1080/01639260802031564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EBSCO'sCommunication & Mass Media Complete: An Appreciable Improvement Over Previous Communication Studies Indexing?

Abstract: In a prior edition of this study, we examined whether the established online communication studies indexes-Communication Abstracts, ComIndex, and ComAbstracts-provided a good avenue of access to the journal literature that researchers in the field cite and whether, where the current journal literature was concerned, that avenue of access might be equal or superior to that provided by large, multisubject online indexes. In David C. Tyler is a Reference Librarian and the departmental liaison for Sociology and fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To ensure a comprehensive literature search, two academic databases in the social sciences were used for the current study: Business Source Complete and Communication and Mass Media Complete (Knoll, 2016). These two databases have been recognized for their comprehensiveness in the fields of business and communication (Tyler et al , 2008). The search fields included the title, abstract and subject.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure a comprehensive literature search, two academic databases in the social sciences were used for the current study: Business Source Complete and Communication and Mass Media Complete (Knoll, 2016). These two databases have been recognized for their comprehensiveness in the fields of business and communication (Tyler et al , 2008). The search fields included the title, abstract and subject.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H. W. Wilson claims that this database is "an excellent choice for libraries" (2009a), but the quality of coverage displayed here for archaeology-as well as the coverage deficiencies OmniFile has displayed in coverage studies for communication studies (Tyler, Boudreau, and Leach 2005;Tyler et al 2008)-are beginning to make the supposed excellence of the database seem rather dubious.…”
Section: Ingentaconnectmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Some have also evaluated web-scale discovery against subject databases in the context of finding information in a particular discipline, often asking if the specificity of a subject database offered advantages over multi-subject databases or web-scale discovery. In terms of coverage of relevant literature, several studies have found that Google Scholar exceeds the standard subject databases in fields such as communication (Tyler et al, 2005(Tyler et al, , 2008, geography (S ¸tirbu et al, 2015), and history (Pearce, 2019), whereas subject databases had superior coverage for archaeology (Tyler et al, 2009). Many of these studies assume a correlation between extent of coverage and usefulness, whereas others appreciate that certain search features might make the subject databases preferable in chemistry (Levine-Clark and Kraus, 2007), health sciences (Bramer et al, 2013), social sciences (Dahlen and Hanson, 2017), or specific purposes such as systematic reviews (Bates et al, 2017;Gusenbauer and Haddaway, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of coverage of relevant literature, several studies have found that Google Scholar exceeds the standard subject databases in fields such as communication (Tyler et al. , 2005, 2008), geography (Ştirbu et al. , 2015), and history (Pearce, 2019), whereas subject databases had superior coverage for archaeology (Tyler et al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%