2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00408-022-00584-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EBUS-TBNA in Extrathoracic Malignancies: Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EBUS-TBNA involves transbronchial transmural needle aspiration guided by ultrasound bronchoscope for puncture sampling as a prevalent method of lung disease examination. Nevertheless, this method has limitations; for instance, when the focus diameter is small, it will be challenging to position and clip the tissue accurately, which will result in missed diagnoses and misdiagnosis (15). The study manifested that the diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA examination for LC is 60.67%, which is slightly lower than the result of a previous study (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…EBUS-TBNA involves transbronchial transmural needle aspiration guided by ultrasound bronchoscope for puncture sampling as a prevalent method of lung disease examination. Nevertheless, this method has limitations; for instance, when the focus diameter is small, it will be challenging to position and clip the tissue accurately, which will result in missed diagnoses and misdiagnosis (15). The study manifested that the diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA examination for LC is 60.67%, which is slightly lower than the result of a previous study (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…6 Moreover, studies revealed that the sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA for diagnosing intrathoracic metastases from extrapulmonary malignancies ranged from 83.3 to 93.3%. [27][28][29][30] Nonetheless, limited emphasis has been placed on the safety and accuracy of EBUS-TBNA for diagnosing previously treated extrathoracic malignancies, especially HNCs. In the present study, the diagnostic sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA in diagnosing intrathoracic metastases after HNC treatment was 88.2%, comparable with the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multicenter randomized controlled trial on the diagnostic value of EBUS‐TBNA for lung cancer reported a sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 92%, 90%, and 95%, respectively 6 . Moreover, studies revealed that the sensitivity of EBUS‐TBNA for diagnosing intrathoracic metastases from extrapulmonary malignancies ranged from 83.3 to 93.3% 27–30 . Nonetheless, limited emphasis has been placed on the safety and accuracy of EBUS‐TBNA for diagnosing previously treated extrathoracic malignancies, especially HNCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with extrathoracic malignancies (ETM), hilar, and mediastinal lymph node (MLN) enlargement raise the suspicion of metastasis. However, MLN may also be due to benign conditions like infections, or granulomatous inflammation 1–3 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%