2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eccentric Femoral Tunnel Widening in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first modification was creating one bone tunnel on the femoral side. Previous reports have indicated that one reason for the poor graft-tunnel healing in DB reconstruction is the larger length-change of the PLB graft compared with that of the AMB graft [7,9,14]. In our procedure, the graft excursion still differs between the AMB and PLB; however, because both bundles are fixed together in the bone tunnel with a single Endobutton, there is less excursion of the PLB graft in the femoral bone tunnel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The first modification was creating one bone tunnel on the femoral side. Previous reports have indicated that one reason for the poor graft-tunnel healing in DB reconstruction is the larger length-change of the PLB graft compared with that of the AMB graft [7,9,14]. In our procedure, the graft excursion still differs between the AMB and PLB; however, because both bundles are fixed together in the bone tunnel with a single Endobutton, there is less excursion of the PLB graft in the femoral bone tunnel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The creation of the femoral tunnel, respecting the ACL native footprint, represents the most challenging aspect of ACL reconstruction; in fact, incorrect positioning of the femoral tunnel accounts for the majority of technical failures following ACL reconstruction. [28][29][30][31][32] In addition, the OTT technique spares the bone stock on the femoral side, which assumes importance in cases of revision surgery involving the femoral tunnel. The technique is also inexpensive, requiring only one staple for graft fixation, and it may be useful in cases of revision where the femoral bone stock is severely reduced or in cases of pediatric ACL reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial volume acquisition was made with 2-mm cuts from 10 cm above the femoral tunnel to 10 cm below the tibial tunnel. Three-dimensional images were reconstructed using a Virtual Place Lexus workstation (AZE, Tokyo, Japan) [7, 12, 13]. As the joint aperture site of the bone tunnels is reportedly enlarged after ACL reconstruction [12, 13], we evaluated both the femoral and the tibial tunnels at the aperture.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three-dimensional images were reconstructed using a Virtual Place Lexus workstation (AZE, Tokyo, Japan) [7, 12, 13]. As the joint aperture site of the bone tunnels is reportedly enlarged after ACL reconstruction [12, 13], we evaluated both the femoral and the tibial tunnels at the aperture. The two groups were compared regarding the tunnel enlargement rates of the cross-sectional areas (CSAs) at the apertures of both the femoral and tibial tunnels from 1 week to 1 year postoperatively, and from 1 week to 2 years postoperatively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%