Public reporting burder for this collection of information is estibated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burder to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. ABSTRACT We collided woody debris (i.e. logs) with structures using flume and test basin laboratory facilities to investigate the maximum impact force that floodplain structures are exposed to by floating woody debris. The tests investigated the influence of collision geometry and construction material of the structure face on the maximum impact forces. Collision geometry was determined by the debris orientation on impact. We reviewed the three approaches that represent the existing guidance on maximum impact forces. Each approach estimates the maximum impact force based on the debris velocity and mass. We show that all the existing approaches can be derived from a singledegree-of-freedom model of the collision and can be considered to be equivalent. The laboratory data show that the maximum impact force was associated with a log striking a rigid structure with its end. Oblique and eccentric collisions reduced the maximum impact load in a predictable and consistent manner. The approach we refer to as ?contact stiffness,? a linear, one-degree-of-freedom model with no damping, was able to reproduce the laboratory results over the entire range of data, with an effective contact stiffness of 2.4 MN/m. All the existing guidance was applied to the laboratory data, and the strengths and weakness of each are discussed. Abstract: We collided woody debris (i.e. logs) with structures using flume and test basin laboratory facilities to investigate the maximum impact force that floodplain structures are exposed to by floating woody debris. The tests investigated the influence of collision geometry and construction material of the structure face on the maximum impact forces. Collision geometry was determined by the debris orientation on impact. We reviewed the three approaches that represent the existing guidance on maximum impact forces. Each approach estimates the maximum impact force based on the debris velocity and mass. We show that all the existing approaches can be derived from a
REPORT DATE (DD-MM
How to get copies of ERDC technical publications:Department of Defense personnel and contractors may order reports through th...