2009 Fifth International Conference on Soft Computing, Computing With Words and Perceptions in System Analysis, Decision and Co 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icsccw.2009.5379457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ECG beat classification by using discrete wavelet transform and Random Forest algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the proposed method is different from the previous work [41,42]. Firstly, we used WPD and entropy instead of DWT coefficients to extract features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the proposed method is different from the previous work [41,42]. Firstly, we used WPD and entropy instead of DWT coefficients to extract features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Result of the proposed method indicates its potentiality in biomedical engineering applications such as Alzheimer disease, breast cancer. Nahit Emanet [11] has proposed method for classification of heartbeat from ECG signal into their respective classes. In this proposed system, preprocessing is performed in order to remove artifact signal from ECG signal.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational complexity of Random Forest is based on the number of features, number of training cases. It is given by [11] √MSlog(S) [1] Where 'M' is the number of features of dataset and 'S' is the number of the training case. As random forest injects randomness in selection of features, reducing 'M' which implies selected features for classification which results into reducing strength of individual tree and the correlation between them.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reached an accuracy of 89% validated with fivefold cross validation. Similar random forest classifiers for ECG classification were developed by Sathish & Vimal [64], or Emanet [65].…”
Section: Random Forestsmentioning
confidence: 99%