2016
DOI: 10.15406/jaccoa.2016.05.00187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ECG Changes during Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Metastasis under General Anaesthesia - A Dilemma with Cardiac Event

Abstract: Electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring is one of the mandatory monitoring during surgery under anaesthesia for identifying any cardiac event like arrthymias or ischemic changes. The operating room is increasingly being studded with various electrical equipments. These electrical gadgets may interfere with the ECG monitoring and thus produce various artifacts mimicking arrthymias or ischemic changes. We report a case of ECG changes induced artifactually by the use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for ablating hepat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radiofrequency ablation produces heat that conducts electrical currents at a prescribed frequency transmissible through soft tissue including the brain. 12 Given the lack of detection to lumbar RFA, we suggest the electrical current produced by RFA created a near-field artifact that was mistakenly detected by the RNS, subsequently leading to mistreatment. Unlike scalp EEG where movement-induced artifact dominates as a seizure mimic, implantable neurostimulators may be more susceptible to electrical artifacts that can be challenging to resolve without applying the strict principles of localization and polarity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Radiofrequency ablation produces heat that conducts electrical currents at a prescribed frequency transmissible through soft tissue including the brain. 12 Given the lack of detection to lumbar RFA, we suggest the electrical current produced by RFA created a near-field artifact that was mistakenly detected by the RNS, subsequently leading to mistreatment. Unlike scalp EEG where movement-induced artifact dominates as a seizure mimic, implantable neurostimulators may be more susceptible to electrical artifacts that can be challenging to resolve without applying the strict principles of localization and polarity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%