2004
DOI: 10.1007/s10334-004-0038-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ECG-gated 23 Na-MRI of the human heart using a 3D-radial projection technique with ultra-short echo times

Abstract: Pathological changes in tissue often manifest themselves in an altered sodium gradient between intra- and extracellular space due to a malfunctioning Na+-K+ pump, resulting in an increase in total sodium concentration in ischaemic regions. Therefore, 23Na-MRI has the potential to non-invasively differentiate viable from non-viable tissue by detecting concentration changes of intra- and extracellular sodium. As the in vivo sodium signal shows a bi-exponential T2 decay, with a short component of less than 1 ms, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The myocardial SNR, however, may not be a good criterion to assess sensitivity, as it can be influenced by varying degrees of contamination by blood signal from the ventricles. The SNR values reported for blood in the ventricles are 13.9 (2), 13.1 (15), and 17.6 (16), and 21.1 in our study. This difference in SNR can most likely be attributed to the different acquisition delays, which vary from 0.4 to 3.6 msec for the studies cited: with a T 2 * of about 13 msec (16), the acquisition delay has a strong influence on the SNR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The myocardial SNR, however, may not be a good criterion to assess sensitivity, as it can be influenced by varying degrees of contamination by blood signal from the ventricles. The SNR values reported for blood in the ventricles are 13.9 (2), 13.1 (15), and 17.6 (16), and 21.1 in our study. This difference in SNR can most likely be attributed to the different acquisition delays, which vary from 0.4 to 3.6 msec for the studies cited: with a T 2 * of about 13 msec (16), the acquisition delay has a strong influence on the SNR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…It is difficult to directly compare the SNR reported by various studies (2,15,16), as different field strengths, coils, and imaging parameters have been used. Renormalizing the literature values to an equivalent SNR definition, to a voxel volume of 1 mL and an experimental duration of 10 minutes, the SNR values reported for LV myocardium are 8.8 (2), 8.0 (15), and 11.7 (16), compared to 11.3 in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For larger organisms ͑from mice to humans͒, it is relatively easy to gate the acquisition with respect to electrocardiograms ͑ECG͒ or respiratory signals-a technique known as prospective gating or triggering-and reconstruct volumes at a fixed moment in the cycle. [5][6][7] Remaining motion artifacts may then be reduced by the use of various elastic registration procedures that warp the spatial data. [8][9][10] In cases where gating is not possible or unreliable, nongated dynamic datasets have been registered by a variety of methods and for various purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cardiac conduction or respiratory motion) to gate the 2D image acquisitions [4][5][6][7]. Alternatively, retrospective temporal registration of image stacks has been used to reconstruct the dynamic motion of cardiac tissues, taking advantage of the quasi-periodic nature of the heart motion [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%