2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Echinocandins vs. amphotericin B against invasive candidiasis in children and neonates: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the extensive use in neonates and premature infants with suspected or proven invasive fungal infection, there are no robust PK data on liposomal amphotericin B in this population and no good information on optimal dosing regimens. Efficacy and safety comparison studies between echinocandins and amphotericin B formulation to treat Candida infections in neonates and infants conclude that there are no differences in efficacy and echinocandins give fewer adverse events than amphotericin B formulation [112][113][114]. All these studies explain the importance to further implement PK data availability of these drugs on neonates.…”
Section: Tdm and Antifungalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the extensive use in neonates and premature infants with suspected or proven invasive fungal infection, there are no robust PK data on liposomal amphotericin B in this population and no good information on optimal dosing regimens. Efficacy and safety comparison studies between echinocandins and amphotericin B formulation to treat Candida infections in neonates and infants conclude that there are no differences in efficacy and echinocandins give fewer adverse events than amphotericin B formulation [112][113][114]. All these studies explain the importance to further implement PK data availability of these drugs on neonates.…”
Section: Tdm and Antifungalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amphotericin B and amphotericin B liposomes are still the recommended first-line drugs, although side effects such as hypokalemia, myocardial injury, and acute kidney injury (AKI) are not rarely seen. Chen et al (2019) reported a meta-analysis to evaluate efficacy and safety of echinocandins vs. amphotericin B in children and neonates, which revealed that the amphotericin B group had a higher risk of treatment discontinuation because of adverse effects. Fluconazole had a good effect in the past, but with increased prophylactic treatment, there has been emergence of drug-resistant strains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…217,218 A recent meta-analysis, which included five randomised control trials of 354 patients (191 patients in the echinocandins group and 163 patients in the amphotericin B group), showed no differences in efficacy between the echinocandins and amphotericin B (D-AMB or L-AMB) in the treatment of IC in children (OR 1.38), although the echinocandin group had a significantly lower risk of discontinuing treatment than the amphotericin B group. 217 In children, echinocandin choice has been dictated by licensing in children and with limited safety and dosing data predominantly available for micafungin or caspofungin, these are favoured. Nonetheless, anidulafungin has emerging evidence for safety and efficacy with global response success rate of 70.8% in children and 68.8% in infants (1 month to 2 years of age), with similar pharmacokinetics to adults.…”
Section: Infants and Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%