2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.11.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Echocardiographic comparison of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) using periodic acceleration (pGz) versus chest compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the devices are designed to be light and compact for out-of-hospital CPR, while the EM-CPR, [13][14][15] the parallel manipulator, 16 and the pGz [17][18][19][20] are intended for in-hospital CPR only ( Table 2). All the devices, but the CardioPump and the LUCAS, perform exclusively chest compression.…”
Section: Cpr Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the devices are designed to be light and compact for out-of-hospital CPR, while the EM-CPR, [13][14][15] the parallel manipulator, 16 and the pGz [17][18][19][20] are intended for in-hospital CPR only ( Table 2). All the devices, but the CardioPump and the LUCAS, perform exclusively chest compression.…”
Section: Cpr Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, they obviate many drawbacks of conventional CPR: no chest or abdominal injuries due to mechanical manipulation, suitability to be used on patients with chest operations, and no limitations based on the chest dimension. [17][18][19][20] Although a manual massage is prone to repeatability errors because the rescuer's performance decreases over time, an automated massage is affected by systematic errors when the device is wrongly positioned (point and direction of compression). Furthermore, an incorrect placement might not only impair the effectiveness of CPR but also increase the risk of injury.…”
Section: Advantages and Limits Of Cpr Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Postresuscitation myocardial stunning has been investigated using echocardiographic variables of ventricular function. In contrast to chest compression, pGzresuscitated swine show fewer instances of myocardial stunning, as evidenced by comparatively better ejection fraction, fractional shortening, and wall motion; less arrhythmias postresuscitation; and overall better myocardial function (114). We also studied postresuscitation biochemical indices of myocardial damage and found a striking difference and attenuation in troponin I, tumor necrosis factor-␣, and IL-6 in pGz-resuscitated animals compared with chest compression (115).…”
Section: Pgz and Cprmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Echocardiography was performed with a HewlettPackard SONOS 2000 echocardiographic system with a 3.5/2.7 MHz transducer and recorded on VCR tapes. In each animal, two-dimensional short-axis view and M-mode tracings were performed according to the recommendation of the American Society of Echocardiography and as previously described by our laboratory (8,36,37). All measurements were performed by an investigator blinded to the treatment assignment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%