2013
DOI: 10.1111/echo.12288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Echocardiographic Estimation of Pulmonary Vascular Resistance in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Utility of Right Heart Doppler Measurements

Abstract: TRV/VTI(RVOT) is only marginally useful for estimating PVR in CTEPH (r = 0.74). Moreover, the regression equation in CTEPH differs significantly from previous studies in pulmonary hypertension. Reasons for this may include the markedly elevated PVR levels in this population and specific effects on VTI(RVOT) from CTEPH.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TAPSE correlated somewhat better with PVR ( r =−.6) than did RVFAC ( r =−.3) prior to PTE, but these r values suggest only a limited clinical utility for these echo parameters. Previous studies have shown that other echocardiographic parameters correlate reasonably well with PVR in CTEPH (including TR velocity/velocity–time integral RVOT [ r =.74], right ventricular Tei index [ r =.78], and tricuspid annular systolic velocity (S') [ r =−.71]) . The echocardiographic method of Abbas for estimating PVR (TR velocity divided by RV outflow tract velocity time integral) also has an r value of .74 when compared with RHC‐derived PVR in a population with CTEPH …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…TAPSE correlated somewhat better with PVR ( r =−.6) than did RVFAC ( r =−.3) prior to PTE, but these r values suggest only a limited clinical utility for these echo parameters. Previous studies have shown that other echocardiographic parameters correlate reasonably well with PVR in CTEPH (including TR velocity/velocity–time integral RVOT [ r =.74], right ventricular Tei index [ r =.78], and tricuspid annular systolic velocity (S') [ r =−.71]) . The echocardiographic method of Abbas for estimating PVR (TR velocity divided by RV outflow tract velocity time integral) also has an r value of .74 when compared with RHC‐derived PVR in a population with CTEPH …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, calculation of CO via the thermodilution method (especially in the setting of tricuspid regurgitation) can lead to errors. Severe tricuspid regurgitation occurs in only ~10% of CTEPH patients, however, and the thermodilution method remains the accepted standard measurement for CO in patients with CTEPH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the aforementioned studies used ultrasound estimation to evaluate RV function and hemodynamics, while RHC was used for evaluation in the current study. It has been reported in a meta-analysis that conventional ultrasound cannot accurately evaluate the extent of PAH or systolic function (13)(14)(15), due to the irregular shape of the RV and technical limitations of ultrasound in measuring area change rate and ejection fraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PVR can be estimated by calculating the TRV:VTI [RVOT] ratio, which is the ratio between TRV and the VTI of blood flow through the RVOT using pulsed-wave Doppler in the parasternal short axis. 33 35 The obtained VTI in the RVOT will be markedly changed in the presence of high PVR due to an earlier and enhanced reflection of the pressure wave. Higher PVR will lead to a decrease in VTI [RVOT] .…”
Section: Echocardiographymentioning
confidence: 99%