1973
DOI: 10.1056/nejm197305102881903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Echocardiographic Measurement of the Left Ventricular Outflow Gradient in Idiopathic Hypertrophic Subaortic Stenosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
1
1

Year Published

1977
1977
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
32
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…"2 13 In addi-tion, a certain number of patients affected by VSD and free of all symptoms may not be recognized or may avoid seeing physicians, and thus escape medical statistics. 3 This study endeavors to give further information about this late evolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"2 13 In addi-tion, a certain number of patients affected by VSD and free of all symptoms may not be recognized or may avoid seeing physicians, and thus escape medical statistics. 3 This study endeavors to give further information about this late evolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the lack of important symptoms, the patients did not routinely undergo cardiac catheterization as part of this protocol. The presence of left ventricular outflow obstruction was assessed at cardiac catheterization in three patients and from the M-mode echocardiogram, based on the magnitude and duration of systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve, 14,15 in the other 26 patients. Eleven patients (38%) had evidence of resting left ventricular outflow obstruction.…”
Section: Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the verapamil dosage at the time of repeat study ranged from 240 to 480 mg/day (mean, 453), and this dosage was maintained for a mean of 6.7 days (range, 2-56) before the repeat study. The verapamil studies were performed [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] weeks (mean, 6±5) after the initial control studies.…”
Section: Study Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, to include a meaningful number of study patients, we relied on echocardiographic identification of systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the anterior mitral leaflet to confirm the hemodynamic results in those patients in whom cardiac catheterization was carried out more than 2.5 years before monitoring, and to include an additional 33 patients in the study who were not catheterized, but in whom the mitral valve could be adequately recorded by echocardiography to determine the presence or absence of SAM. The magnitude of obstruction was estimated by previously described echocardiographic methods based on the degree of approximation of the anterior mitral leaflet to the ventricular septum.3 9 Mean age of the patients with and without obstruction was the same (38 + 2 years (SEM), ranges 9-65 and 12-64 years, respectively). None of the patients had undergone cardiac operation before electrocardiographic monitoring.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%